Primary Care and Population Sciences Division, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Feb;13(2):123-9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70300-6. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
Lower-respiratory-tract infection is one of the most common acute illnesses managed in primary care. Few placebo-controlled studies of antibiotics have been done, and overall effectiveness (particularly in subgroups such as older people) is debated. We aimed to compare the benefits and harms of amoxicillin for acute lower-respiratory-tract infection with those of placebo both overall and in patients aged 60 years or older.
Patients older than 18 years with acute lower-respiratory-tract infections (cough of ≤28 days' duration) in whom pneumonia was not suspected were randomly assigned (1:1) to either amoxicillin (1 g three times daily for 7 days) or placebo by computer-generated random numbers. Our primary outcome was duration of symptoms rated "moderately bad" or worse. Secondary outcomes were symptom severity in days 2-4 and new or worsening symptoms. Investigators and patients were masked to treatment allocation. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2007-001586-15), UKCRN Portfolio (ID 4175), ISRCTN (52261229), and FWO (G.0274.08N).
1038 patients were assigned to the amoxicillin group and 1023 to the placebo group. Neither duration of symptoms rated "moderately bad" or worse (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 0.96-1.18; p=0.229) nor mean symptom severity (1.69 with placebo vs 1.62 with amoxicillin; difference -0.07 [95% CI -0.15 to 0.007]; p=0.074) differed significantly between groups. New or worsening symptoms were significantly less common in the amoxicillin group than in the placebo group (162 [15.9%] of 1021 patients vs 194 [19.3%] of 1006; p=0.043; number needed to treat 30). Cases of nausea, rash, or diarrhoea were significantly more common in the amoxicillin group than in the placebo group (number needed to harm 21, 95% CI 11-174; p=0.025), and one case of anaphylaxis was noted with amoxicillin. Two patients in the placebo group and one in the amoxicillin group needed to be admitted to hospital; no study-related deaths were noted. We noted no evidence of selective benefit in patients aged 60 years or older (n=595).
When pneumonia is not suspected clinically, amoxicillin provides little benefit for acute lower-respiratory-tract infection in primary care both overall and in patients aged 60 years or more, and causes slight harms.
European Commission Framework Programme 6, UK National Institute for Health Research, Barcelona Ciberde Enfermedades Respiratorias, and Research Foundation Flanders.
下呼吸道感染是初级保健中最常见的急性疾病之一。已经进行了很少的安慰剂对照抗生素研究,总体有效性(特别是在老年人等亚组中)存在争议。我们旨在比较阿莫西林与安慰剂治疗急性下呼吸道感染的益处和危害,包括总体情况和 60 岁及以上患者。
年龄大于 18 岁的急性下呼吸道感染(咳嗽持续时间≤28 天)且未怀疑患有肺炎的患者,通过计算机生成的随机数按 1:1 的比例随机分配(1 g 阿莫西林,每日 3 次,持续 7 天)或安慰剂。我们的主要结局是症状持续时间被评为“中度差”或更差。次要结局是第 2-4 天的症状严重程度和新出现或恶化的症状。研究者和患者对治疗分配进行了盲法。该试验在 EudraCT(2007-001586-15)、英国临床试验注册中心(ID 4175)、ISRCTN(52261229)和 FWO(G.0274.08N)进行了注册。
1038 名患者被分配至阿莫西林组,1023 名患者被分配至安慰剂组。症状持续时间评为“中度差”或更差(风险比 1.06,95%CI 0.96-1.18;p=0.229)和平均症状严重程度(安慰剂组为 1.69,阿莫西林组为 1.62;差值-0.07 [95%CI -0.15 至 0.007];p=0.074)均无显著差异。阿莫西林组新出现或恶化的症状明显少于安慰剂组(1021 名患者中有 162 例[15.9%],1006 名患者中有 194 例[19.3%];p=0.043;需要治疗的人数 30)。阿莫西林组恶心、皮疹或腹泻的病例明显多于安慰剂组(需要治疗的人数 21,95%CI 11-174;p=0.025),并且在阿莫西林组中发现了 1 例过敏反应。安慰剂组中有 2 名患者和阿莫西林组中有 1 名患者需要住院治疗;未发现与研究相关的死亡病例。我们未发现 60 岁及以上患者有选择性获益的证据(n=595)。
当临床上不怀疑患有肺炎时,阿莫西林对初级保健中的急性下呼吸道感染几乎没有益处,无论是整体情况还是 60 岁及以上患者,并且会引起轻微的危害。
欧盟第六框架计划、英国国家卫生研究院、巴塞罗那呼吸疾病 Ciberde 网络和佛兰德研究基金会。