Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 Feb;7(2):264-71. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 25.
Estimation of match probabilities for singleton haplotypes of lineage markers, i.e. for haplotypes observed only once in a reference database augmented by a suspect profile, is an important problem in forensic genetics. We compared the performance of four estimators of singleton match probabilities for Y-STRs, namely the count estimate, both with and without Brenner's so-called 'kappa correction', the surveying estimate, and a previously proposed, but rarely used, coalescent-based approach implemented in the BATWING software. Extensive simulation with BATWING of the underlying population history, haplotype evolution and subsequent database sampling revealed that the coalescent-based approach is characterized by lower bias and lower mean squared error than the uncorrected count estimator and the surveying estimator. Moreover, in contrast to the two count estimators, both the surveying and the coalescent-based approach exhibited a good correlation between the estimated and true match probabilities. However, although its overall performance is thus better than that of any other recognized method, the coalescent-based estimator is still computation-intense on the verge of general impracticability. Its application in forensic practice therefore will have to be limited to small reference databases, or to isolated cases of particular interest, until more powerful algorithms for coalescent simulation have become available.
单体单倍型(即仅在参考数据库中观察到一次的单倍型,该参考数据库由嫌疑档案扩充而来)的等位基因标记匹配概率的估计是法医学遗传学中的一个重要问题。我们比较了用于 Y-STR 的四种单体单倍型匹配概率估计器的性能,即计数估计器(包括和不包括 Brenner 所谓的“kappa 校正”)、普查估计器,以及之前提出但很少使用的基于合并的方法,该方法在 BATWING 软件中实现。通过 BATWING 对基础种群历史、单倍型进化以及随后的数据库抽样进行广泛模拟后发现,与未校正的计数估计器和普查估计器相比,基于合并的方法具有较低的偏差和较低的均方误差。此外,与两种计数估计器相反,普查和基于合并的方法都表现出估计的匹配概率与真实匹配概率之间的良好相关性。然而,尽管它的整体性能优于任何其他公认的方法,但基于合并的估计器仍然计算密集,几乎无法普遍应用。在更强大的合并模拟算法可用之前,它在法医实践中的应用将不得不限于小型参考数据库或特别感兴趣的孤立案例。