Department of General Surgery, Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 29 Xinquan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):1923-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2688-3. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility and early outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with a modified splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for upper- and middle-third stage cT1-2 gastric cancer.
A total of 97 patients diagnosed with upper- and middle-third stage cT1-T2 gastric cancer were enrolled. Patients were assigned to the laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy group (LATG, n = 41) or the open total gastrectomy group (OTG, n = 56). All patients underwent total gastrectomy with modified splenic hilar lymphadenectomy. The operative and postoperative measures, number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs), and complications were compared between the two groups.
The mean number of dissected LNs was not significantly different between the two groups: 23.1 ± 8.0 in the LATG group versus 24.2 ± 7.5 in the OTG group. Compared with the OTG group, the LATG group had less operative blood loss [104.2 ± 42.9 vs. 355.6 ± 51.3 ml (p < 0.0001)], shorter time to out-of-bed activities [14.4 ± 3.2 vs. 16.5 ± 1.2 h (p < 0.0001)], shorter time to first flatus [72.2 ± 16.2 vs. 78.4 ± 8.6 h (p = 0.017)], earlier resumption of soft diet [52.8 ± 21.6 vs. 74.2 ± 12.2 h (p < 0.0001)], and shorter postoperative hospital stay [9.7 ± 2.2 vs. 13.6 ± 3.6 days (p < 0.0001)]. However, LATG had a slightly longer operating time than OTG [235.7 ± 38.5 vs. 211.5 ± 33.2 min (p = 0.001)]. The operative complications rates for the LATG and OTG groups were not significantly different: 4.9 versus 5.4 %.
For upper- and middle-third stage cT1-2 gastric cancer, a limited splenic hilar lymphadenectomy strategy seems to be safe and feasible, particularly for the number of retrieved LNs. However, this technique is not suitable for cT3 disease.
本研究旨在探讨改良脾门淋巴结清扫术辅助腹腔镜全胃切除术治疗中上段 cT1-2 期胃癌的可行性和早期疗效。
共纳入 97 例中上段 cT1-T2 期胃癌患者,分为腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术组(LATG 组,n=41)和开腹全胃切除术组(OTG 组,n=56)。所有患者均行全胃切除术并改良脾门淋巴结清扫术。比较两组患者的手术和术后措施、淋巴结清扫数量和并发症。
两组患者的平均淋巴结清扫数量无显著差异:LATG 组为 23.1±8.0 枚,OTG 组为 24.2±7.5 枚。与 OTG 组相比,LATG 组术中出血量更少[104.2±42.9 比 355.6±51.3 ml(p<0.0001)],下床活动时间更早[14.4±3.2 比 16.5±1.2 h(p<0.0001)],首次排气时间更早[72.2±16.2 比 78.4±8.6 h(p=0.017)],开始软食时间更早[52.8±21.6 比 74.2±12.2 h(p<0.0001)],术后住院时间更短[9.7±2.2 比 13.6±3.6 d(p<0.0001)]。但 LATG 组的手术时间略长于 OTG 组[235.7±38.5 比 211.5±33.2 min(p=0.001)]。两组患者的手术并发症发生率无显著差异:4.9%比 5.4%。
对于中上段 cT1-2 期胃癌,局限性脾门淋巴结清扫策略似乎是安全可行的,尤其在淋巴结清扫数量方面。但该技术不适合 cT3 期疾病。