Suppr超能文献

甲状腺结节大小与癌症预测。

Thyroid nodule size and prediction of cancer.

机构信息

Thyroid Section, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Hypertension, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, PBB-B4, Room 417, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Feb;98(2):564-70. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2968. Epub 2012 Dec 28.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Thyroid nodule size is routinely measured, although its impact on thyroid cancer risk is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the association of nodule size upon cancer risk.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis at an academic hospital with 4955 consecutive patients evaluated between 1995 and 2009.

INTERVENTION

Ultrasound and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of nodules >1 cm was done. Indeterminate and malignant nodules were referred for surgery, and histopathology was reviewed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The presence and histological subtype of cancer was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 7348 evaluated nodules, 927 (13%) were cancerous. Of those 1.0 to 1.9 cm in diameter, 10.5% were cancerous. In contrast, of those >2.0 cm, 15% were cancerous (P < .01). However, nodules 2.0 to 2.9, 3.0 to 3.9, and >4 cm were cancerous in 14%, 16%, and 15% of cases (P = .14), respectively, demonstrating no graded increase in risk beyond the 2-cm threshold. When malignant, the proportion of papillary carcinoma decreased (nodules 1.0-1.9 cm, 92% of cases; 2.0-2.9 cm, 88%; 3.0-3.9 cm, 83%; >4 cm, 74% [P < .01]), while follicular carcinoma increased (1.0-1.9 cm, 6%; 2.0-2.9 cm, 7%; 3.0-3.9 cm, 12%; >4 cm, 16% [P < .01]) as nodules enlarged. Nodules size did not influence cytology distribution or risk of false-negative aspirates.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing thyroid nodule size impacts cancer risk in a nonlinear fashion. A threshold is detected at 2.0 cm, beyond which cancer risk is unchanged. However, the risk of follicular carcinomas and other rare thyroid malignancies increases as nodules enlarge.

摘要

背景

甲状腺结节的大小通常会被测量,尽管其对甲状腺癌风险的影响尚不清楚。

目的

我们旨在评估结节大小与癌症风险之间的关联。

设计、地点和患者:我们在一家学术医院进行了一项回顾性队列分析,共纳入了 1995 年至 2009 年间连续评估的 4955 例患者。

干预措施

对直径大于 1cm 的结节进行超声检查和超声引导下细针抽吸。不确定和恶性结节被转诊进行手术,同时对组织病理学进行了回顾。

主要观察指标

评估癌症的存在和组织学亚型。

结果

在评估的 7348 个结节中,927 个(13%)为癌性。直径在 1.0 至 1.9cm 的结节中,有 10.5%为癌性。相比之下,直径大于 2.0cm 的结节中,有 15%为癌性(P<.01)。然而,直径在 2.0 至 2.9cm、3.0 至 3.9cm 和大于 4cm 的结节中,癌症发生率分别为 14%、16%和 15%(P=0.14),表明在 2cm 阈值之外,风险没有呈等级性增加。当恶性时,乳头状癌的比例降低(直径 1.0-1.9cm 的结节中,92%为癌性;直径 2.0-2.9cm 的结节中,88%为癌性;直径 3.0-3.9cm 的结节中,83%为癌性;直径大于 4cm 的结节中,74%为癌性[P<.01]),而滤泡状癌的比例增加(直径 1.0-1.9cm 的结节中,6%为癌性;直径 2.0-2.9cm 的结节中,7%为癌性;直径 3.0-3.9cm 的结节中,12%为癌性;直径大于 4cm 的结节中,16%为癌性[P<.01])。结节大小并不影响细胞学分布或假阴性抽吸的风险。

结论

甲状腺结节的大小呈非线性方式影响癌症风险。在 2.0cm 处检测到一个阈值,超过该阈值后,癌症风险保持不变。然而,随着结节的增大,滤泡状癌和其他罕见的甲状腺恶性肿瘤的风险增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验