Division of Urology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Urol. 2013 Jun;189(6):2112-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.063. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
Controversy exists regarding antibiotic prophylaxis before shock wave lithotripsy. The AUA (American Urological Association) guideline recommends universal antibiotic prophylaxis, whereas the EAU (European Association of Urology) guideline recommends prophylaxis only for select patients. We evaluated the use of targeted antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing urinary tract infections in patients undergoing shock wave lithotripsy.
A prospective single cohort study was performed during 6 months with patients undergoing shock wave lithotripsy. All patients underwent urine dipstick and culture before shock wave lithotripsy. Targeted antibiotic prophylaxis was provided at the discretion of the treating urologist. All patients had a urine culture performed after shock wave lithotripsy and completed a survey documenting fevers or urinary symptoms. The primary outcome was the incidence of urinary tract infections, urosepsis and asymptomatic bacteriuria after shock wave lithotripsy. The secondary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of urinary dipstick leukocytes and nitrites.
A total of 526 patients were enrolled in the study. Of the 389 patients included in the determination of the primary outcome, urinary tract infection developed in only 1 (0.3%), urosepsis did not develop in any patients and asymptomatic bacteriuria developed in 11 (2.8%). Eight (2.1%) patients were administered antibiotic prophylaxis. The specificity of urine dipstick nitrites was high (95%) while the sensitivity was poor (9.7%).
In our cohort study using targeted antibiotic prophylaxis the rates of urinary tract infection after shock wave lithotripsy and rates of asymptomatic bacteriuria were extremely low, with no development of urosepsis. This finding questions the need for universal antibiotic prophylaxis before shock wave lithotripsy.
冲击波碎石术前是否需要预防性使用抗生素存在争议。AUA(美国泌尿外科学会)指南建议普遍使用抗生素预防,而 EAU(欧洲泌尿外科学会)指南则建议仅对特定患者进行预防。我们评估了在接受冲击波碎石术的患者中使用靶向抗生素预防来预防尿路感染的效果。
在 6 个月期间进行了前瞻性单队列研究,纳入了接受冲击波碎石术的患者。所有患者在冲击波碎石术前均进行尿试纸和培养。靶向抗生素预防由治疗泌尿科医生酌情决定。所有患者在冲击波碎石术后均进行尿液培养,并完成一份记录发热或尿路症状的调查。主要结局是冲击波碎石术后尿路感染、菌血症和无症状菌尿的发生率。次要结局是尿试纸白细胞和亚硝酸盐的敏感性和特异性。
共有 526 名患者入组该研究。在确定主要结局的 389 名患者中,仅 1 名(0.3%)发生尿路感染,无患者发生菌血症,11 名(2.8%)发生无症状菌尿。8 名(2.1%)患者接受了抗生素预防。尿试纸亚硝酸盐的特异性较高(95%),而敏感性较差(9.7%)。
在我们使用靶向抗生素预防的队列研究中,冲击波碎石术后尿路感染和无症状菌尿的发生率极低,没有发生菌血症。这一发现质疑了冲击波碎石术前普遍使用抗生素预防的必要性。