Suppr超能文献

意识障碍患者的照料者:应对和长期悲伤。

Caregivers of patients with disorders of consciousness: coping and prolonged grief.

机构信息

Fundación Instituto San José, Orden Hospitalaria de San Juan de Dios, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Scand. 2013 Jun;127(6):413-8. doi: 10.1111/ane.12061. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study the relationship between coping strategies and prolonged grief disorder (PGD) in caregivers of patients with disorders of consciousness: vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-three caregivers of 43 patients with VS or MCS were assessed using PG-12 and Brief COPE-28. Mean differences for each coping strategy between caregivers of patients with/without PGD were compared using Bonferroni-adjusted t-tests, and the size effect was calculated (Cohen's d).

RESULTS

The frequency of PGD was very high (n = 32; 60.40%). The most common coping strategies were problem-focused: active coping (mean = 6.41; SD = 1.02), Instrumental support (mean = 6.41; SD = 1.06), Planning (mean = 6.32; SD = 1.01) and Acceptance (mean = 6.20; SD = 1.29). Acceptance predicted a lower presence of PGD (P = 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.02), while Denial (P = 0.003; Cohen's d = 0.98) and Self-blame (P = 0.004, Cohen's d = 0.91) increased the presence of PGD.

CONCLUSIONS

The caregivers of patients with VS or MCS show a high risk of PGD. Problem-focused coping strategies are the most used. Acceptance is highly protective of PGD, and Denial and Self-blame are associated with an increased presence of PGD. PGD in caregivers of patients in VS or MCS should be evaluated, Acceptance and problem-focused strategies should be promoted, and Denial and Self-blame should be diminished.

摘要

目的

研究应对策略与意识障碍患者(植物状态或最小意识状态)照料者的持续性悲伤障碍(PGD)之间的关系。

材料和方法

对 43 名 VS 或 MCS 患者的 53 名照料者进行 PG-12 和Brief COPE-28 评估。使用 Bonferroni 调整的 t 检验比较有/无 PGD 患者照料者之间每种应对策略的平均值差异,并计算效应大小(Cohen's d)。

结果

PGD 的发生率非常高(n = 32;60.40%)。最常见的应对策略是问题导向:积极应对(均值= 6.41;SD = 1.02)、工具性支持(均值= 6.41;SD = 1.06)、计划(均值= 6.32;SD = 1.01)和接受(均值= 6.20;SD = 1.29)。接受预测 PGD 的发生率较低(P = 0.001;Cohen's d = 1.02),而否认(P = 0.003;Cohen's d = 0.98)和自责(P = 0.004,Cohen's d = 0.91)则增加了 PGD 的发生率。

结论

VS 或 MCS 患者的照料者表现出高度的 PGD 风险。问题导向的应对策略是最常用的。接受对 PGD 有高度保护作用,而否认和自责与 PGD 的发生率增加有关。应评估 VS 或 MCS 患者照料者的 PGD,促进接受和问题导向策略,并减少否认和自责。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验