Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia e Dell'Emilia Romagna (IZSLER), via A. Bianchi 9, 25124 Brescia, Italy.
Res Vet Sci. 2013 Jun;94(3):510-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.12.003. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
Major discrepancies are observed between experimental trials of PRRS-virus (PRRSV) infection in isolation facilities and observations made in the field on farm. Owing to the above, a cohort study was carried out in a farrow-to-finish, PRRSV-infected pig farm to characterize the time-course of the virus-specific immune response in two groups of replacement gilts. Despite the occurrence of three and two distinct waves of infection in groups 1 and 2, respectively, the large majority of animals showed little if any PRRSV-specific response in an interferon-gamma release assay on whole blood, whereas non-specific responses were consistently observed. To rule out any possible bias of our test procedure, this was used along with an ELISPOT assay for interferon-gamma-secreting cells with the same reagents on a group of PRRS-virus infected pigs in isolation facilities. A very good agreement was shown between the two sets of results. Also, as opposed to the PRRS model, plenty of Pseudorabies virus-vaccinated pigs under field conditions scored positive in another experiment in the interferon-gamma release assay, ad hoc modified for the Pseudorabies virus. Our results indicate that under field conditions poor or no development rather than delayed development of the PRRS virus-specific interferon-gamma response could be the rule for a long time in non-adult pigs after PRRS virus infection. Housing and hygiene conditions, as well as heavy exposure to environmental microbial payloads in intensive pig farms could adversely affect the host's immune response to PRRS virus and partly account for the discrepancies between experimental and field studies.
在隔离设施中进行的 PRRS 病毒(PRRSV)感染实验与在农场现场观察到的结果之间存在很大差异。鉴于上述情况,在一个繁殖-育肥的 PRRSV 感染猪场进行了一项队列研究,以描述两组后备母猪的病毒特异性免疫反应的时间过程。尽管第 1 组和第 2 组分别发生了三次和两次明显的感染波,但大多数动物在全血干扰素-γ释放试验中几乎没有或没有任何 PRRSV 特异性反应,而持续观察到非特异性反应。为了排除我们测试程序的任何可能偏差,我们在隔离设施中用相同的试剂对一组 PRRS 病毒感染猪进行了干扰素-γ分泌细胞的 ELISPOT 检测,并结合全血干扰素-γ释放试验一起使用。结果表明,这两种方法的结果非常吻合。此外,与 PRRS 模型相反,在另一个针对伪狂犬病病毒的干扰素-γ释放试验中,大量在现场接种伪狂犬病病毒疫苗的猪呈阳性,该试验为伪狂犬病病毒进行了专门修改。我们的结果表明,在现场条件下,PRRS 病毒感染后非成年猪的 PRRS 病毒特异性干扰素-γ反应发展不良或不发展可能是很长一段时间的规律,而不是延迟发展。集约化猪场的饲养和卫生条件以及大量接触环境微生物负荷可能会对宿主对 PRRS 病毒的免疫反应产生不利影响,并部分解释了实验研究和现场研究之间的差异。