UC Davis, Tahoe Environmental Research Center, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, United States.
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Feb 1;444:579-90. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.019. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
The Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requires detailed methodologies to identify sources of flows and pollutants (particles and nutrients) for estimating time-variant loads as input data for the Lake Tahoe clarity model. Based on field data and a modeling study, the major sources of pollutant loads include streams (three subdivisions of this category are urban, nonurban, and stream channel erosion), intervening zones (IZs) (two subdivisions of this category are urban and nonurban), atmosphere (wet and dry), groundwater and shoreline erosion. As Lake Tahoe remains well oxygenated year-round, the contribution of internal loading from the bottom sediments was considered minor. A comprehensive quantitative estimate for fine particle number (< 16 μm diameter) and nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) loading is presented. Uncertainties in the estimation of fine particle numbers and nutrients for different sources are discussed. Biologically available phosphorus and nitrogen were also evaluated. Urban runoff accounted for 67% of the total fine particle load for all sources making it the most significant contributor although total urban runoff was only 6%. Non-urban flows accounted for 94% of total upland runoff, but the nitrogen, phosphorus and fine sediment loadings were 18%, 47% and 12%, respectively of the total loadings. Atmospheric nitrogen, phosphorus, and fine particle loadings were approximately 57%, 20%, and 16%, respectively of the total loading. Among streams and IZs, IZ 8000, Upper Truckee River, Trout Creek, Blackwood Creek, and Ward Creek are the top fine particle, nitrogen and phosphorus contributors. The relative percentage contribution of inorganic fine particles from all sources based on annual average for the period 1994-2008 on size classes 0.5-1, 1-2, 2-4, 4-8, and 8-16 μm are 73%, 19%, 5%, 2%, and 1%, respectively. These results suggest clear priorities for resource managers to establish TMDL on sources and incoming pollutants and preserving lake clarity.
太浩湖全流域最大日负荷(TMDL)要求采用详细的方法来确定流量和污染物(颗粒和养分)的来源,以便将时变负荷作为太浩湖清澈模型的输入数据进行估算。基于野外数据和建模研究,污染物负荷的主要来源包括溪流(该类别分为三个分支,即城市、非城市和溪流侵蚀)、中间地带(IZ)(该类别分为两个分支,即城市和非城市)、大气(干湿)、地下水和湖滨侵蚀。由于太浩湖全年保持良好的充氧状态,因此底泥的内部负荷贡献被认为较小。本文提出了一个关于细颗粒数量(<16μm 直径)和营养物(氮和磷)负荷的综合定量估算。讨论了不同来源细颗粒数量和养分估算的不确定性。还评估了生物可利用的磷和氮。城市径流占所有来源的总细颗粒负荷的 67%,尽管总城市径流量仅为 6%,但它仍是最重要的贡献者。非城市流量占旱地总径流量的 94%,但氮、磷和细泥沙负荷分别占总负荷的 18%、47%和 12%。大气氮、磷和细颗粒负荷分别约占总负荷的 57%、20%和 16%。在溪流和 IZ 中,IZ 8000、上塔基河、鳟鱼溪、黑木溪和沃德溪是细颗粒、氮和磷的主要贡献者。根据 1994-2008 年期间的年平均值,基于大小类别 0.5-1、1-2、2-4、4-8 和 8-16μm,所有来源的无机细颗粒的相对百分比贡献分别为 73%、19%、5%、2%和 1%。这些结果表明,资源管理者在确定 TMDL 的来源和输入污染物以及保护湖泊清澈度方面,有明确的优先事项。