Shewchuk R M, Foelker G A, Niederehe G
University of Alabama, Birmingham.
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1990;30(3):213-24. doi: 10.2190/UFK8-TMFH-NP5W-LRHQ.
Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the appropriateness of using with elderly persons Levenson's multidimensional locus of control (LoC) scale that measures beliefs in Internal Control (I), Control by Powerful Others (P), and Chance (C). Data were obtained from elderly individuals in Florida and Texas and reformulated to allow cross-validation at each step in a series of model evaluations. Results indicated that Levenson's three-factor specification of control was not a valid representation of the samples' responses. A model that specified the elimination of eleven unreliable items and the formation of a new external control factor that was based on the remaining C and P items provided an adequate fit to the data for both samples. The failure to confirm Levenson's three-factor structure poses a construct-validity and measurement-equivalence problem when making age-based comparisons of LoC scores.
验证性因素分析用于检验对老年人使用莱文森多维控制点(LoC)量表的适宜性,该量表测量内部控制(I)、他人控制(P)和机遇控制(C)信念。数据取自佛罗里达州和得克萨斯州的老年人,并进行了重新整理,以便在一系列模型评估的每个步骤进行交叉验证。结果表明,莱文森的三因素控制模型不能有效代表样本的反应。一个剔除了11个不可靠项目并基于剩余的C和P项目形成新的外部控制因素的模型,对两个样本的数据都提供了充分的拟合。未能验证莱文森的三因素结构,在基于年龄比较LoC分数时,会带来结构效度和测量等效性问题。