Suppr超能文献

造口旁疝的危险因素:基于影像学定义。

Risk factors for parastomal hernia: based on radiological definition.

作者信息

Hong Sung Yeon, Oh Seung Yeop, Lee Jae Hee, Kim Do Yoon, Suh Kwang Wook

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Surg Soc. 2013 Jan;84(1):43-7. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.84.1.43. Epub 2012 Dec 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological incidence of parastomal hernia and to analyze the risk factors for parastomal hernia.

METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively 108 patients with end colostomy from January 2003 to June 2010. Age, sex, surgical procedure type, body mass index (kg/m(2)), stoma size, and respiratory comorbidity were documented.

RESULTS

There were 61 males (56.5%) and 47 females (43.5%). During an overall median follow-up of 25 months (range, 6 to 73 months), 36 patients (33.3%) developed a radiological parastomal hernia postoperatively and 29 patients (26.9%) presented with a clinical parastomal hernia. In multivariate analysis, gender (odds ratio [OR], 6.087; P = 0.008), age (OR, 1.109; P = 0.009) and aperture size (OR, 6.907; P < 0.001) proved to be significant and independent risk factors after logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the incidence of radiological parastomal hernia is higher than clinical parastomal hernia. Risk factors for parastomal hernia proved to be female, age, and aperture size.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查造口旁疝的临床和影像学发生率,并分析造口旁疝的危险因素。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2003年1月至2010年6月期间108例行结肠造口术的患者。记录患者的年龄、性别、手术方式、体重指数(kg/m²)、造口大小和呼吸系统合并症。

结果

男性61例(56.5%),女性47例(43.5%)。在平均25个月(范围6至73个月)的随访期间,36例患者(33.3%)术后出现影像学造口旁疝,29例患者(26.9%)出现临床造口旁疝。多因素分析显示,经逻辑回归分析,性别(比值比[OR],6.087;P = 0.008)、年龄(OR,1.109;P = 0.009)和造口孔径大小(OR,6.907;P < 0.001)是显著且独立的危险因素。

结论

本研究表明,影像学造口旁疝的发生率高于临床造口旁疝。造口旁疝的危险因素为女性、年龄和造口孔径大小。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for parastomal hernia: based on radiological definition.
J Korean Surg Soc. 2013 Jan;84(1):43-7. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.84.1.43. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
2
Computed tomography classification for parastomal hernia.
J Korean Surg Soc. 2011 Aug;81(2):111-4. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2011.81.2.111. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
5
Prospective audit of parastomal hernia: prevalence and associated comorbidities.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Jan;53(1):71-6. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181bdee8c.
7
Prophylactic stoma mesh did not prevent parastomal hernias.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Sep;30(9):1217-22. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2293-8. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
8
Etiological analysis of parastomal hernia by computed tomography examination.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019 Sep;14(3):387-393. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.81409. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
9
Prevention of parastomal hernia by intraperitoneal onlay mesh reinforcement at the time of stoma formation.
Hernia. 2012 Dec;16(6):655-60. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0947-9. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
10
Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia.
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012 Oct;28(5):241-6. doi: 10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.241. Epub 2012 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Parastomal Hernia Presentations: A 10-Year Review of Management and Outcomes.
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Nov 28;3:13364. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13364. eCollection 2024.
2
Umbrella review of systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of using mesh in the prevention of parastomal hernias.
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1577-1589. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03137-2. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
3
A risk prediction model based on machine learning algorithm for parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02627-8.
4
Risk Factors for the Development of Parastomal Hernia: A Narrative Review.
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2023 Jul-Sep;11(3):187-192. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_235_22. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
5
Surgical treatment strategy for recurrent parastomal hernia: Experiences from 17 cases.
Front Surg. 2022 Aug 2;9:928743. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.928743. eCollection 2022.
6
Risk factors for the development of a parastomal hernia in patients with enterostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Mar;37(3):507-519. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04068-5. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
10
Comparison of different modalities for the diagnosis of parastomal hernia: a systematic review.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Feb;35(2):199-212. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03499-5. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

本文引用的文献

2
The inter-observer reliability is very low at clinical examination of parastomal hernia.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jan;26(1):89-95. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1050-2. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
3
Prospective audit of parastomal hernia: prevalence and associated comorbidities.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Jan;53(1):71-6. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181bdee8c.
4
Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia.
Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):583-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec809.
5
Waist circumference is an independent risk factor for the development of parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Dec;51(12):1806-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9366-5. Epub 2008 May 16.
6
The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification.
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Feb;11(2):173-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01564.x. Epub 2008 May 3.
7
Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Oct;49(10):1559-63. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0681-4.
8
Prevention of parastomal hernia using preperitoneal mesh: a prospective observational study.
Colorectal Dis. 2006 Oct;8(8):672-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00996.x.
9
Prevention of parastomal hernia by placement of a polypropylene mesh at the primary operation.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Aug;49(8):1131-5. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0615-1.
10
Preventing and treating parastomal hernia.
World J Surg. 2005 Aug;29(8):1086-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7973-z.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验