Suppr超能文献

多重聚合酶链反应检测用于诊断急性病毒性肝炎 A

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction test for the diagnosis of acute viral hepatitis A.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Mol Hepatol. 2012 Dec;18(4):397-403. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2012.18.4.397. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The early diagnosis of acute hepatitis A (AHA) is hindered because serum IgM against hepatitis A virus (HAV) can yield false-negative results during the window period. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit for HAV RNA for the diagnosis of AHA.

METHODS

Samples were collected from 136 patients with acute severe hepatitis at their admission to Asan Medical Center between June 2010 and July 2010. Samples were analyzed for serum IgM anti-HAV using an immunoassay test and for qualitative HAV RNA using the Magicplex HepaTrio PCR test kit. The diagnostic accuracies of these methods were tested on the basis of clinical and laboratory diagnoses of AHA.

RESULTS

The concordance rate and kappa value between IgM anti-HAV and HAV RNA PCR were 88.2% and 0.707, respectively. For the diagnosis of AHA, the sensitivity and specificity of IgM anti-HAV were 90.7% and 100%, respectively, when an "equivocal" result was regarded as positive; and 79.1% and 100%, respectively, when an "equivocal" result was regarded as negative. The sensitivity and specificity of HAV RNA PCR were 81.4% and 100%, respectively. All four patients with negative IgM anti-HAV and positive HAV RNA PCR results and all four patients with equivocal IgM anti-HAV RNA and positive HAV RNA PCR results were eventually diagnosed with AHA.

CONCLUSIONS

The qualitative HAV RNA PCR test has an equivalent diagnostic accuracy for AHA compared to IgM anti-HAV and may be more sensitive during the window period.

摘要

背景/目的:急性甲型肝炎(AHA)的早期诊断受到阻碍,因为在窗口期,血清甲型肝炎病毒(HAV)IgM 可能产生假阴性结果。本研究评估了 HAV RNA 聚合酶链反应(PCR)试剂盒用于诊断 AHA 的诊断准确性。

方法

从 2010 年 6 月至 7 月期间在 Asan 医疗中心入院的 136 例急性重症肝炎患者中采集样本。使用免疫测定试验分析血清 IgM 抗-HAV,并使用 Magicplex HepaTrio PCR 测试试剂盒对定性 HAV RNA 进行分析。根据 AHA 的临床和实验室诊断测试这些方法的诊断准确性。

结果

IgM 抗-HAV 和 HAV RNA PCR 之间的符合率和 Kappa 值分别为 88.2%和 0.707。对于 AHA 的诊断,当将“可疑”结果视为阳性时,IgM 抗-HAV 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 90.7%和 100%;当将“可疑”结果视为阴性时,灵敏度和特异性分别为 79.1%和 100%。HAV RNA PCR 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 81.4%和 100%。所有 4 例 IgM 抗-HAV 阴性和 HAV RNA PCR 阳性的患者以及所有 4 例 IgM 抗-HAV RNA 可疑和 HAV RNA PCR 阳性的患者最终均被诊断为 AHA。

结论

与 IgM 抗-HAV 相比,定性 HAV RNA PCR 试验对 AHA 的诊断准确性相当,并且在窗口期可能更敏感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b2b/3540377/7c85d2040bc4/cmh-18-397-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验