Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA.
Blood. 2013 Mar 28;121(13):2424-31. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-10-462440. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies acute myeloid leukemia (AML) via genetic, immunophenotypic, biological, and clinical features. Still, "AML, not otherwise specified (NOS)" is further subdivided based on morphologic criteria similar to those of the French-American-British (FAB) classification. We analyzed the relevance of this practice in patients with newly diagnosed "AML, NOS" with available FAB information undergoing curative-intent therapy in trials of 3 cooperative study groups (Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial Group for Hematology/Oncology [HOVON], UK Medical Research Council/National Cancer Research Institute [MRC/NCRI], and the US cooperative group Southwest Oncology Group [SWOG]) or at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Ignoring information on NPM1 and CEBPA, 5848 patients met criteria for "AML, NOS." After multivariate adjustment, FAB M0 was independently associated with significantly lower likelihood of achieving complete remission and inferior relapse-free and overall survival as compared with FAB M1, M2, M4, M5, and M6, with inconclusive data regarding M7. However, restricting attention to known NPM1(neg) patients, FAB M0 was no longer associated with worse outcomes; restricting attention to patients known to be NPM1(neg)/CEPBA(neg) (ie, honoring the provisional entities of "AML with mutated NPM1" and "AML with mutated CEBPA") did not affect this result. In conclusion, in the 2008 WHO classification scheme, FAB subclassification does not provide prognostic information for "AML, NOS" cases if data on NPM1 and CEBPA mutations are available.
世界卫生组织(WHO)通过遗传、免疫表型、生物学和临床特征对急性髓系白血病(AML)进行分类。然而,“AML,未另作说明(NOS)”根据与法国-美国-英国(FAB)分类相似的形态学标准进一步细分。我们分析了在接受 3 个合作研究组(荷兰-比利时血液学/肿瘤学合作组[HOVON]、英国医学研究理事会/国家癌症研究所[MRC/NCRI]和美国合作组西南肿瘤组[SWOG])的临床试验中或在 MD 安德森癌症中心接受有治愈意向治疗的新诊断为“AML,NOS”且有可用 FAB 信息的患者中,这种做法的相关性。忽略关于 NPM1 和 CEBPA 的信息,5848 例患者符合“AML,NOS”的标准。在多变量调整后,FAB M0 与完全缓解的可能性显著降低、无复发生存率和总生存率较低独立相关,与 FAB M1、M2、M4、M5 和 M6 相比,而 M7 的数据尚无定论。然而,将注意力限制在已知的 NPM1(neg)患者中,FAB M0 与较差的结局不再相关;将注意力限制在已知 NPM1(neg)/CEBPA(neg)的患者中(即,承认“具有突变 NPM1 的 AML”和“具有突变 CEBPA 的 AML”的暂定实体)并不影响这一结果。总之,在 2008 年 WHO 分类方案中,如果有 NPM1 和 CEBPA 突变的数据,FAB 亚分类对于“AML,NOS”病例不提供预后信息。