• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉再次手术后,左前降支冠状动脉内乳动脉移植的价值。

Value of internal thoracic artery grafting to the left anterior descending coronary artery at coronary reoperation.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 22;61(3):302-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.045.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.045
PMID:23328610
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study sought to determine if left internal thoracic artery (LITA) grafting of the left anterior descending (LAD) at reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improves patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND

LITA grafting to the LAD is the gold standard for primary CABG, but its value for reoperative CABG is unknown.

METHODS

From January 1985 to January 2007, reoperative CABG was performed in 3,473 patients who did not receive a LITA during their primary CABG and whose anterior myocardium (LAD) was at risk at reoperation: 2,389 had LITA grafting and 1,084 saphenous vein (SV) grafting to the LAD. Propensity matching (908 matched pairs) was used for balanced comparison of outcomes. Follow-up was continued to 20 years post-operatively, with a mean follow-up of 11 ± 8.2 years.

RESULTS

Unadjusted hospital mortality was 2.2% and 6.5% in the LITA and SV groups, respectively (p < 0.001), but 3.1% and 5.6% in propensity-matched groups (p = 0.008). Unadjusted survival at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 94%, 82%, 64%, 46%, and 32% for the LITA group, but 88%, 73%, 50%, 32%, and 18% for the SV group (p <.0001), respectively. For propensity-matched groups, both early (p = 0.01) and late survival was greater (p = 0.005) in the LITA group. At 20 years, LITA grafting of the LAD at reoperation resulted in an absolute mortality risk reduction of 6.0% and a hazard ratio of 0.85, with number needed to treat of 16 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

LITA-to-LAD grafting at reoperation is safe and confers a risk-adjusted survival advantage. When appropriate, a LITA should be used to revascularize the LAD at coronary reoperations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨在再次冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中,左内乳动脉(LITA)对左前降支(LAD)的搭桥是否能改善患者的预后。

背景

LITA 桥接至 LAD 是初次 CABG 的金标准,但对于再次 CABG 的价值尚不清楚。

方法

1985 年 1 月至 2007 年 1 月,对 3473 例初次 CABG 时未行 LITA 且再次手术时前壁心肌(LAD)有风险的患者进行再次 CABG 手术:2389 例行 LITA 桥接,1084 例行大隐静脉(SV)桥接至 LAD。采用倾向性匹配(908 对匹配)来平衡比较结局。术后随访至 20 年,平均随访 11 ± 8.2 年。

结果

未校正的住院死亡率分别为 LITA 组 2.2%和 SV 组 6.5%(p < 0.001),但倾向性匹配组分别为 3.1%和 5.6%(p = 0.008)。未校正的 LITA 组 1、5、10、15 和 20 年生存率分别为 94%、82%、64%、46%和 32%,SV 组分别为 88%、73%、50%、32%和 18%(p < 0.0001)。对于倾向性匹配组,LITA 组的早期(p = 0.01)和晚期生存率均更高(p = 0.005)。20 年时,再次手术时 LAD 的 LITA 桥接可使绝对死亡率降低 6.0%,风险比为 0.85,需要治疗的患者人数为 16 人。

结论

再次手术时 LITA 桥接至 LAD 是安全的,并能带来风险调整后的生存优势。在合适的情况下,应使用 LITA 来为再次 CABG 的 LAD 进行血运重建。

相似文献

1
Value of internal thoracic artery grafting to the left anterior descending coronary artery at coronary reoperation.冠状动脉再次手术后,左前降支冠状动脉内乳动脉移植的价值。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 22;61(3):302-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.045.
2
Late outcomes after radial artery versus saphenous vein grafting during reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery.再次冠状动脉旁路移植手术中桡动脉与隐静脉桥的晚期结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jun;139(6):1511-1518.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.07.068. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
3
Age cutoff for the loss of survival benefit from use of radial artery in coronary artery bypass grafting.桡动脉在冠状动脉旁路移植术中应用丧失生存获益的年龄界限。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1078-84; discussion 1084-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
4
Radial artery conduits improve long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting.桡动脉移植物可改善冠状动脉旁路移植术后的长期生存率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Oct;90(4):1165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.038.
5
Safe approach for redo coronary artery bypass grafting--preventing injury to the patent graft to the left anterior descending artery.再次冠状动脉旁路移植术的安全方法——预防对左前降支通畅移植血管的损伤。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Aug;16(4):253-8.
6
The second best arterial graft: a propensity analysis of the radial artery versus the free right internal thoracic artery to bypass the circumflex coronary artery.第二条最佳动脉移植物:桡动脉与游离右内乳动脉旁路回旋支冠状动脉的倾向分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
7
Radial artery grafting in women improves 15-year survival.女性桡动脉搭桥可提高 15 年生存率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Dec;146(6):1467-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
8
Improved survival with radial artery versus vein conduits in coronary bypass surgery with left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending artery grafting.在冠状动脉搭桥手术中,使用桡动脉而非静脉作为左胸廓内动脉至左前降支动脉移植的血管桥可提高生存率。
Circulation. 2004 Mar 30;109(12):1489-96. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121743.10146.78. Epub 2004 Mar 15.
9
Does grafting of the left anterior descending artery with the in situ right internal thoracic artery have an impact on late outcomes in the context of bilateral internal thoracic artery usage?在双侧胸廓内动脉使用的情况下,将左前降支动脉与原位右胸廓内动脉进行移植对远期预后有影响吗?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Oct;148(4):1275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.11.045. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
10
Decision-making for patients with patent left internal thoracic artery grafts to left anterior descending.对于左乳内动脉移植至左前降支的患者的决策制定。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 May;87(5):1392-8; discussion 1400. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.032.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic-Assisted Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Single-Center Experience.机器人辅助再次冠状动脉旁路移植术:单中心经验
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025;31(1). doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00026.
2
Two Decades of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Women: Has Anything Changed?女性冠状动脉旁路移植术二十年:有什么变化吗?
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2023 Aug 19;1(4):626-630. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2023.07.015. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus repeat surgical revascularization in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
既往接受冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与再次外科血运重建:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JTCVS Open. 2022 Oct 28;12:177-191. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.10.006. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the era of Advanced PCI.再次行冠状动脉旁路移植术的时代——高级 PCI 时代。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug 16;37(4):546-553. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0206.
5
Redo coronary artery bypass grafting.再次冠状动脉旁路移植术。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;34(Suppl 3):272-278. doi: 10.1007/s12055-018-0651-1. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
6
Comprehensive epigenome characterization reveals diverse transcriptional regulation across human vascular endothelial cells.全面的表观基因组特征分析揭示了人类血管内皮细胞中多样化的转录调控。
Epigenetics Chromatin. 2019 Dec 19;12(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13072-019-0319-0.
7
Redo coronary artery bypass grafting.再次冠状动脉旁路移植术。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Aug;62(8):453-60. doi: 10.1007/s11748-014-0426-6. Epub 2014 Jun 7.