Suppr超能文献

心脏手术后患者使用全血阻抗凝集法和旋转血栓弹力图进行出血风险评估。

Bleeding risk assessment using whole blood impedance aggregometry and rotational thromboelastometry in patients following cardiac surgery.

作者信息

Petricevic Mate, Biocina Bojan, Milicic Davor, Konosic Sanja, Svetina Lucija, Lekić Ante, Zdilar Boris, Burcar Ivan, Milosevic Milan, Brahimaj Rifat, Samardzic Jure, Gasparovic Hrvoje

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia,

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2013 Nov;36(4):514-26. doi: 10.1007/s11239-013-0868-1.

Abstract

Excessive bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is risk factor for adverse outcomes after elective cardiac surgery (ECS). Differentiating between patients who bleed due to surgical issues and those whose excessive chest tube output (CTO) is due to coagulopathy, remains challenging. Bedside suitable tests to identify hemostatic disturbances and predict excessive bleeding are desirable. The study sought to evaluate prediction of excessive bleeding after ECS using two bedside suitable devices for platelet function and viscoelastic blood clot properties assessment. We enrolled 148 patients (105 male and 43 female) undergoing ECS in a prospective observational study. Patients were characterized as bleeders if their 24 h CTO exceeded the 75th percentile of distribution. Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA, with ASPI, ADP and the TRAP test) and rotational thromboelastometry (TEM, with ExTEM, HepTEM and FibTEM test), were performed at three time points: preoperatively (T1), during CPB (T2), and after protamine administration (T3). The primary endpoint was CTO and the secondary endpoint was administration of blood products, 30-day and 1 year mortality. The best predictors of increased bleeding tendency were the tests performed after protamine administration (T3). At T3, patients characterized as bleeders had significantly lower MEA ASPI (median, 14 vs. 27 AUC, p = 0.004) and ADP test values (median, 22 vs. 41 AUC, p = 0.002) as well as TEM values expressed in maximum clot firmness after 30 min (MCF 30) for ExTEM (53 vs. 56 mm, p = 0.005), HepTEM (48 vs. 52 mm, p = 0.003) and FibTEM (8 vs. 11 mm, p < 0.001) test. 24 h CTO inversely correlated with both the MEA (ASPI test: r = -0.236, p = 0.004; ADP test: r = -0.299, p < 0.001), and TEM MCF 30 (ExTEM: r = -0.295, p < 0.001; HepTEM: -0.329, p < 0.001; FibTEM: -0.377, p < 0.001) test values. Our study showed that MEA and TEM are useful methods for prediction of excessive bleeding after ECS. In order to prevent excessive postoperative CTO, hemostatic interventions with timely and targeted blood component therapy according to MEA and TEM results should be considered.

摘要

体外循环(CPB)后出血过多是择期心脏手术(ECS)后不良结局的危险因素。区分因手术问题出血的患者和因凝血功能障碍导致胸管引流量(CTO)过多的患者仍然具有挑战性。需要床边适用的检测方法来识别止血障碍并预测出血过多情况。本研究旨在使用两种适用于床边的设备评估血小板功能和粘弹性血凝块特性,以预测ECS后出血过多情况。我们纳入了148例接受ECS的患者(105例男性和43例女性)进行前瞻性观察研究。如果患者24小时CTO超过分布的第75百分位数,则将其归类为出血者。在三个时间点进行多电极聚集测定(MEA,采用ASPI、ADP和TRAP试验)和旋转血栓弹力测定(TEM,采用ExTEM、HepTEM和FibTEM试验):术前(T1)、CPB期间(T2)和鱼精蛋白给药后(T3)。主要终点是CTO,次要终点是血液制品的使用、30天和1年死亡率。出血倾向增加的最佳预测指标是鱼精蛋白给药后(T3)进行的检测。在T3时,被归类为出血者的患者MEA的ASPI(中位数,14 vs. 27 AUC,p = 0.004)和ADP试验值(中位数,22 vs. 41 AUC,p = 0.002)以及ExTEM(53 vs. 56 mm,p = 0.005)、HepTEM(48 vs.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验