Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, USA.
Emotion. 2013 Jun;13(3):497-505. doi: 10.1037/a0031070. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
Most studies of meditation have focused on "actual affect" (how people actually feel). We predict that meditation may even more significantly alter "ideal affect" (how people ideally want to feel). As predicted, meditators ideally wanted to feel calm more and excited less than nonmeditators, but the groups did not differ in their actual experience of calm or excited states (Study 1). We ruled out self-selection and nonspecific effects by randomly assigning participants to meditation classes, an improvisational theater class, or a no class control (Study 2). After eight weeks, meditators valued calm more but did not differ in their actual experience of calm compared with the other groups. There were no differences in ideal or actual excitement, suggesting that meditation selectively increases the value placed on calm. These findings were not due to expectancy effects (Study 3). We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding how meditation alters affective life.
大多数冥想研究都集中在“实际影响”(人们的实际感受)上。我们预测,冥想甚至可能更显著地改变“理想影响”(人们理想中的感受)。正如所预测的那样,冥想者比非冥想者更希望自己感到平静,而不是兴奋,但两组在平静或兴奋状态的实际体验上没有差异(研究 1)。我们通过随机分配参与者参加冥想课程、即兴戏剧课程或不参加课程控制来排除自我选择和非特异性影响(研究 2)。八周后,冥想者更重视平静,但与其他组相比,他们在平静的实际体验上没有差异。在理想或实际兴奋方面没有差异,这表明冥想可以选择性地增加对平静的重视。这些发现并不是由于期望效应(研究 3)。我们讨论了这些发现对理解冥想如何改变情感生活的意义。