Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Mar;216(3):447-53; quiz 510-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.012. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
Diagnosis and characterization of incisional hernia are often established by CT, which incurs radiation exposure and substantial cost in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to determine the comparative effectiveness of surgeon-performed Dynamic Abdominal Sonography for Hernia (DASH) vs CT for incisional hernia evaluation.
Patients with previous abdominal operations and recent CT imaging were enrolled prospectively; patients with stomas, fistula, or soft tissue infection were excluded. In the clinic setting, DASH was performed with prerequisite training of the American College of Surgeons Ultrasound for Surgeons Basic Course. Clinical evidence of hernia, results of DASH examination, and radiologist documentation of incisional hernia were compared with the gold standard of surgeon-interpreted CT. Testing characteristics of sensitivity and specificity were compared and predictive values were calculated. Inter-rater reliability was performed by comparing DASH results in a subgroup of patients with 3 different evaluators.
There were 181 patients enrolled, with a mean age of 54 years, and 68% were women. In patients in whom hernias were identified, the mean hernia size was 44.6 cm(2) (range 0.2 to 468.3 cm(2)). The DASH examination showed high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (88%). Hernia prevalence was 55% in this population, resulting in positive and negative predictive values of 91% and 97%, respectively. Four patients had clinically detectable hernias that were not seen on CT but were discovered with DASH. Inter-rater reliability for DASH was high, with an observed intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.79.
The DASH examination is an accurate alternative to CT scan for diagnosing abdominal wall hernias, with additional benefits of no radiation exposure and instant bedside interpretation. The use of DASH to detect hernia recurrence can greatly facilitate long-term follow-up of hernia patients.
切口疝的诊断和特征通常通过 CT 确定,但在临床实践中,这会带来辐射暴露和大量成本。本研究的目的是确定外科医生进行的动态腹部超声检查(DASH)与 CT 对切口疝评估的比较效果。
前瞻性纳入有既往腹部手术和近期 CT 影像学的患者;排除造口、瘘管或软组织感染的患者。在诊所环境中,进行 DASH 检查需要经过美国外科医师学院超声医师基础课程的先决培训。将疝的临床证据、DASH 检查结果和放射科医生对切口疝的记录与外科医生解释的 CT 的金标准进行比较。比较了敏感性和特异性的检测特征,并计算了预测值。通过比较 3 位不同评估者的亚组患者的 DASH 结果来评估组内一致性。
共纳入 181 例患者,平均年龄 54 岁,68%为女性。在疝被识别的患者中,平均疝大小为 44.6cm²(范围 0.2 至 468.3cm²)。DASH 检查显示出高敏感性(98%)和特异性(88%)。该人群的疝患病率为 55%,阳性和阴性预测值分别为 91%和 97%。有 4 例患者有临床可检测的疝,但 CT 未见,而 DASH 发现了这些疝。DASH 的组内一致性较高,观察到的组内相关系数为 0.79。
DASH 检查是诊断腹壁疝的一种准确替代 CT 扫描的方法,具有无辐射暴露和即时床边解读的额外益处。使用 DASH 检测疝复发可以极大地促进疝患者的长期随访。