Wang Ke, Zhang Rong, Zhao Guo-Ping
Key Laboratory of Disease and Health Genomics, National Engineering Research Center for Biochip at Shanghai, Shanghai.
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2012 Nov;32(11):1508-11, 1515.
To explore the effects of low-and high-frequency electroacupuncture (EA) on the gene expression profiles in rat spinal dorsal horn (DH) under the physiological state, thus providing the information to find out the differences of different EA frequencies induced effects.
Using cDNA microarray, the changes of the gene expressions in the DH were detected and compared between 2 Hz EA and 100 Hz EA at bilateral Zusanli (ST36) and Sanyinjiao (SP6). The differentially expressed genes were identified. The EASE scores were used to comprehensively analyze the gene functions (by Gene Ontology) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways.
(1) After EA stimulation 1 150 genes/expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were differentially expressed by 2 Hz EA, while 1 270 genes/ESTs were differentially expressed by 100 Hz EA. (2) Both 2 Hz and 100 Hz EA could induce the modulation of the same 516 genes/ESTs in the same direction, which was correlated with neural signal transmission. (3) The differentially expressed genes regulated specifically by 2 Hz were correlated with neural plasticity. (4) The differentially expressed genes regulated specifically by 100 Hz were correlated with stress and immunoregulation.
Either low-or high-frequency EA could extensively regulate the spinal cord information processing. The low-frequency EA participated more in the regulation of neural plasticity, while high-frequency EA had more significant effects on stress and immunoregulation.
探讨低频和高频电针(EA)对生理状态下大鼠脊髓背角(DH)基因表达谱的影响,从而为找出不同频率电针诱导效应的差异提供信息。
采用cDNA微阵列技术,检测并比较双侧足三里(ST36)和三阴交(SP6)给予2Hz电针和100Hz电针后DH中基因表达的变化。鉴定差异表达基因。使用EASE评分综合分析基因功能(通过基因本体论)和京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)通路。
(1)电针刺激后,2Hz电针使1150个基因/表达序列标签(EST)差异表达,而100Hz电针使1270个基因/EST差异表达。(2)2Hz和100Hz电针均可诱导516个相同基因/EST在相同方向上的调节,这与神经信号传递相关。(3)2Hz特异性调节的差异表达基因与神经可塑性相关。(4)100Hz特异性调节的差异表达基因与应激和免疫调节相关。
低频或高频电针均可广泛调节脊髓信息处理。低频电针更多地参与神经可塑性的调节,而高频电针对应激和免疫调节的影响更显著。