Swickhamer Connie, Colvig Cameron, Chan Shu B
Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Resurrection Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60631, USA.
J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):869-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.02.080. Epub 2013 Jan 27.
The elderly frequently suffer from altered mental status and other medical conditions requiring physical or chemical restraint for safety in the Emergency Department (ED).
This study examined outcomes of restrained elderly patients in the ED.
A 2-year retrospective study was conducted in an urban community teaching hospital ED. Included were patients ≥65 years of age who were physically restrained in the ED and hospitalized. Data collected included age, gender, restraint indications, restraint type, restraint duration, adverse outcomes, ED discharge diagnosis, ED disposition, hospital length of stay, and disposition.
There were 83 patients in the study. Forty-seven (56.6%) were nursing home residents. Twenty-seven (32.5%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. Thirty-five (42.2%) received both chemical and physical restraint. The average number of patient medications on arrival to the ED was eight, and 3 patients were on a medication that could adversely interact with a chemical restraint medication. The mean inpatient length of stay was 7.2 days (SD 5.7 days). Ten patients expired, 14 were discharged home, and 59 were discharged to a nursing facility (8 with new behavioral medications). Of the 36 patients originally presenting to the ED from home, only 11 (30.6%) were discharged back to home. There were no significant differences in outcome between patients who received a combination of both chemical and physical restraints and patients who received physical restraint alone.
In this 2-year retrospective study, elderly patients placed in physical restraints in the ED had no recorded adverse outcomes. In addition, there were no adverse outcomes when they received both physical and chemical restraint. Elderly patients who were originally admitted from home and subsequently required physical restraint were unlikely to return home.
老年人常出现精神状态改变及其他需要在急诊科(ED)进行身体或药物约束以保障安全的医疗状况。
本研究调查了急诊科中受到约束的老年患者的结局。
在一家城市社区教学医院的急诊科进行了一项为期2年的回顾性研究。纳入的患者为年龄≥65岁、在急诊科受到身体约束并住院的患者。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、约束指征、约束类型、约束持续时间、不良结局、急诊科出院诊断、急诊科处置方式、住院时间及出院去向。
本研究共纳入83例患者。47例(56.6%)为养老院居民。27例(32.5%)入住重症监护病房。35例(42.2%)同时接受了药物和身体约束。患者到达急诊科时平均用药数量为8种,3例患者正在使用可能与药物约束药物产生不良相互作用的药物。平均住院时间为7.2天(标准差5.7天)。10例患者死亡,14例出院回家,59例出院至护理机构(8例使用了新的行为药物)。最初从家中到急诊科就诊的36例患者中,只有11例(30.6%)出院回家。接受药物和身体联合约束的患者与仅接受身体约束的患者在结局上无显著差异。
在这项为期2年的回顾性研究中,在急诊科受到身体约束的老年患者未记录到不良结局。此外,他们接受药物和身体联合约束时也未出现不良结局。最初从家中入院且随后需要身体约束的老年患者不太可能回家。