Suppr超能文献

症状性股骨髋臼撞击症:偏心距减小与软骨损伤是否相关?一项初步研究。

Symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement: does the offset decrease correlate with cartilage damage? A pilot study.

机构信息

Medical Faculty, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2173-82. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2812-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current measures of the reduced head-neck offset such as residual deformity of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) including the alpha angle, which measures the femoral head-neck sphericity but does not account for acetabular abnormalities, do not represent the true magnitude of the deformity and the mechanical consequences. The beta angle (angle between the femoral head-neck junction and acetabular rim) accounts for the morphology of both the acetabulum and femur and, thus, may be the more appropriate parameter for assessing SCFE deformity.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined (1) whether the beta angle could be reliably measured on MRI; and (2) whether the beta angle correlates with the cartilage status.

METHODS

We recruited 10 adult patients (mean age, 28 years) with symptomatic cam femoroacetabular impingement and 15 asymptomatic volunteers (mean age, 24 years) to have three-dimensional MRI including delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) for cartilage status assessment. Corresponding alpha angles, beta angles, and acetabular dGEMRIC indices were obtained in seven radial reformats to assess the hip in seven regions (anterior to superior and posterior).

RESULTS

We noted high reproducibility for both alpha and beta angle measurements. The dGEMRIC indices correlated with beta angles in the superoinferior and superior regions but not the alpha angles.

CONCLUSIONS

Beta angle measurement in radial MR images is reproducible and appears to correspond to cartilage damage in the superior regions of the hip. The beta angle may be a useful parameter to assess hip deformity in the followup of SCFE although further confirmation is warranted.

摘要

背景

目前评估头-颈偏移减小的方法,如股骨颈干角(alpha 角),可以测量股骨头颈的球形度,但不能反映髋臼异常,也不能代表真正的畸形程度和力学后果。beta 角(股骨头颈交界处与髋臼缘之间的角度)可以反映髋臼和股骨的形态,因此,可能是评估股骨颈干滑脱(SCFE)畸形的更合适的参数。

问题/目的:我们确定(1)beta 角是否可以在 MRI 上可靠地测量;(2)beta 角是否与软骨状态相关。

方法

我们招募了 10 名有症状的凸轮型股骨髋臼撞击症的成年患者(平均年龄 28 岁)和 15 名无症状的志愿者(平均年龄 24 岁),进行三维 MRI 检查,包括软骨延迟钆增强 MRI(dGEMRIC)评估软骨状态。在七个放射状重建图像中获得相应的 alpha 角、beta 角和髋臼 dGEMRIC 指数,以评估髋关节的七个区域(前上和后上)。

结果

我们注意到 alpha 角和 beta 角测量都具有高度的可重复性。dGEMRIC 指数与髋关节上、下区域的 beta 角相关,但与 alpha 角无关。

结论

在放射状 MRI 图像中测量 beta 角具有可重复性,并且似乎与髋关节上区域的软骨损伤相关。beta 角可能是评估 SCFE 随访中髋关节畸形的有用参数,但需要进一步证实。

相似文献

1
Symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement: does the offset decrease correlate with cartilage damage? A pilot study.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2173-82. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2812-2.
5
Case reports: acetabular damage after mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2163-72. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2715-7.
6
7
How Does the dGEMRIC Index Change After Surgical Treatment for FAI? A Prospective Controlled Study: Preliminary Results.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1080-1099. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5098-3.
8
Cam deformity and hip degeneration are common after fixation of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
Acta Orthop. 2014 Dec;85(6):585-91. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.957078. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
10
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: relevant pathophysiological findings with open surgery.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2156-62. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2818-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for early symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement following in situ fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Apr 1;28:101851. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101851. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Primary cam morphology; bump, burden or bog-standard? A concept analysis.
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Nov;55(21):1212-1221. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103308. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
3
Advanced Imaging in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Current State and Future Prospects.
Front Surg. 2015 Jul 24;2:34. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00034. eCollection 2015.
4
OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Hip imaging in clinical trials in osteoarthritis.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 May;23(5):716-31. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.03.004.
5
Current knowledge and importance of dGEMRIC techniques in diagnosis of hip joint diseases.
Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Aug;44(8):1073-83. doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2135-3. Epub 2015 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
3
Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of hip joint cartilage: pearls and pitfalls.
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2011;3(2):e11. doi: 10.4081/or.2011.e11. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
4
Acetabular morphology in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Apr-May;31(3):254-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31820fcc81.
6
The plain beta-angle measured on radiographs in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Sep;92(9):1203-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.24410.
9
[Radiological diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement].
Radiologe. 2009 May;49(5):425-33. doi: 10.1007/s00117-009-1833-z.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验