Réanimation Polyvalente, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France.
Intensive Care Med. 2013 May;39(5):872-80. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2814-2. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and serious problem in intensive care units (ICU). Anticoagulant treatments have demonstrated their efficacy in preventing VTE. However, when the bleeding risk is high, they are contraindicated, and mechanical devices are recommended. To date, mechanical prophylaxis has not been rigorously evaluated in any trials in ICU patients.
In this multicenter, open-label, randomized trial with blinded evaluation of endpoints, we randomly assigned 407 patients with a high risk of bleeding to receive intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) associated with graduated compression stockings (GCS) or GCS alone for 6 days during their ICU stay. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a VTE between days 1 and 6, including nonfatal symptomatic documented VTE, or death due to a pulmonary embolism, or asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis detected by ultrasonography systematically performed on day 6.
The primary outcome was assessed in 363 patients (89.2%). By day 6, the incidence of the primary outcome was 5.6% (10 of 179 patients) in the IPC + GCS group and 9.2% (17 of 184 patients) in the GCS group (relative risk 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.28-1.28; p = 0.19). Tolerance of IPC was poor in only 12 patients (6.0%). No intergroup difference in mortality rate was observed.
With the limitation of a low statistical power, our results do not support the superiority of the combination of IPC + GCS compared to GCS alone to prevent VTE in ICU patients at high risk of bleeding.
静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是重症监护病房(ICU)中常见且严重的问题。抗凝治疗已证明其在预防 VTE 中的有效性。然而,当出血风险较高时,抗凝治疗被禁忌,此时推荐使用机械装置。迄今为止,机械预防措施尚未在 ICU 患者的任何试验中得到严格评估。
在这项多中心、开放标签、随机试验中,我们对终点进行了盲法评估,将 407 例出血风险高的患者随机分配接受间歇气动压缩(IPC)联合梯度压力弹力袜(GCS)或仅 GCS 治疗,持续 6 天。主要终点是在 ICU 住院期间的第 1 至第 6 天发生 VTE,包括非致命有症状的记录 VTE,或因肺栓塞导致的死亡,或在第 6 天通过系统超声检查发现无症状的深静脉血栓形成。
363 例患者(89.2%)评估了主要结局。在第 6 天,IPC+GCS 组的主要结局发生率为 5.6%(179 例患者中有 10 例),GCS 组为 9.2%(184 例患者中有 17 例)(相对风险 0.60;95%置信区间 0.28-1.28;p=0.19)。仅 12 例患者(6.0%)出现 IPC 耐受性差。两组间死亡率无差异。
由于统计学效力较低的限制,我们的结果不支持与单独使用 GCS 相比,IPC+GCS 联合使用在预防出血风险高的 ICU 患者 VTE 方面具有优越性。