加拿大和美国的卫生技术评估：生物制品案例
Health technology assessment in Canada and the United States: the case of biologics.
作者信息
Haas J Scott, Moskowitz Eric J
出版信息
Biotechnol Healthc. 2007 Apr;4(2):47-51.
Abstract
Canadian health technology assessments (HTAs) are coordinated by government agencies, while HTA activity in the United States is conducted haphazardly by a variety of interest groups. As a result, biologic therapies have diffused more slowly and rationally in Canada, according to the authors. If HTAs were conducted similarly in the United States, the distribution of biologics might occur more efficiently.
摘要
加拿大的卫生技术评估（HTA）由政府机构协调，而美国的HTA活动则由各种利益集团随意开展。作者认为，结果是生物疗法在加拿大的推广更为缓慢且合理。如果美国以类似方式进行HTA，生物制剂的分布可能会更有效率。
相似文献
1
Health technology assessment in Canada and the United States: the case of biologics.
Biotechnol Healthc. 2007 Apr;4(2):47-51.
2
Economic evaluations conducted by Canadian health technology assessment agencies: where do we stand?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Fall;24(4):437-44. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080574.
3
Redefining health technology assessment in Canada: diversification of products and contextualization of findings.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Summer;20(3):325-36. doi: 10.1017/s026646230400114x.
4
Health Technology Assessment for Molecular Diagnostics: Practices, Challenges, and Recommendations from the Medical Devices and Diagnostics Special Interest Group.
Value Health. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(5):577-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 May 11.
5
Health technology assessment, research, and implementation within a health region in Alberta, Canada.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Summer;19(3):513-20. doi: 10.1017/s0266462303000448.
6
Modes of coordination for health technology adoption: Health Technology Assessment agencies and Group Procurement Organizations in a polycentric regulatory regime.
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113528. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113528. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
7
Evaluations of public health interventions produced by health technology assessment agencies: A mapping review and analysis by type and evidence content.
Health Policy. 2021 Aug;125(8):1054-1064. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 May 25.
8
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS REPORTING COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(3):89-96. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000180. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
9
Phakic intraocular lenses for the treatment of refractive errors: an evidence-based analysis.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(14):1-120. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
10
Differences between systematic reviews and health technology assessments: a trade-off between the ideals of scientific rigor and the realities of policy making.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Spring;20(2):177-83. doi: 10.1017/s0266462304000959.
引用本文的文献
1
Denosumab versus bisphosphonates for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumors: a systematic review.
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(4):487-499. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1011-1. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
本文引用的文献
1
University technology transfer offices: a status report.
Biotechnol Healthc. 2005 Feb;2(2):48-53.
2
Use of health technology assessment in decision making: coresponsibility of users and producers?
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Spring;21(2):268-75.
3
End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: a way to increase impact.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Spring;21(2):263-7.
4
Cross-national comparison of technology assessment processes.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Summer;20(3):300-10. doi: 10.1017/s0266462304001126.
5
6
If you have it, you use it. Latest Blues association study finds new technology not only drives demand but also increases spending.
Mod Healthc. 2003 Nov 10;33(45):9, 11.
7
A national technology assessment institute.
Healthplan. 2003 Sep-Oct;44(5):40-5.
8
Health technology assessment, research, and implementation within a health region in Alberta, Canada.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Summer;19(3):513-20. doi: 10.1017/s0266462303000448.
9
Health technology assessment in the United States. Past, present, and future.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Spring;18(2):192-8. doi: 10.1017/s026646230200020x.
10
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE): symposium on technology assessment.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Spring;18(2):159-212.
Zotero 插件