School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, 480 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2100, USA.
J Chromatogr A. 2013 Mar 1;1279:36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.12.028. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
The stoichiometric displacement models developed in the literature have been widely used for understanding the adsorption mechanisms of solutes in various chromatography systems. The models were used to explain the linear plots of the logarithms of the solute retention factor versus the molar concentration of a competitive modifier in an inert solvent. The slope of the linear plot was inferred to be the total number of modifier molecules displaced from the sorbent and from the solute-modifier complex upon adsorption of a solute molecule. The slopes reported in the literature were generally greater than 1. In this study, we determined the retention factors of five monovalent solutes, acetone, cyclo hexanone, benzaldehyde, phenylacetaldehyde, and hydrocinnamaldehyde, on a derivatized polysaccharide sorbent, amylose tris[(S)-α-methylbenzylcarbamate], or AS, as a function of the concentration of a polar modifier isopropanol (IPA) in n-hexane (an inert solvent). Each solute has one CO functional group, which can form an H-bond with a sorbent NH group and the OH group of IPA. The slopes, from 0.25 to 0.45, of the log-log plots are less than 1, which cannot be explained by the literature displacement models. The results of Infrared Spectroscopy and Density Functional Theory simulations show clear evidence of acetone-IPA complexation and IPA aggregation with average aggregation number n=3. A new thermodynamic retention model is developed to take into account IPA aggregation, IPA-solute complexation, and competitive adsorption. Dimensionless group analysis indicates that aggregation of IPA can lead to slopes B below 1, even at high IPA concentrations. The model parameters (IPA aggregation number and equilibrium constants) are estimated from the retention factors at different IPA concentrations. The retention model and the parameters are further validated with dynamic chromatography simulations. The results show that the aggregation leads to a significant reduction in the IPA monomer concentration, which affects the IPA-sorbent binding and the IPA-solute complexation. As a result, the slope of the log-log plot at a high IPA concentration approaches 1/n without complexation, or 2/n with complexation. The variations of B between the five achiral solutes can be due to different strengths of solute-IPA complexation. Hence, the complexation and aggregation of the polar modifier in the mobile phase must be accounted for in the retention models used in the interpretation of the retention factors and the adsorption mechanisms.
文献中开发的化学计量置换模型已被广泛用于理解各种色谱系统中溶质的吸附机制。这些模型用于解释在惰性溶剂中,溶质保留因子的对数与竞争性改性剂的摩尔浓度的线性图。线性图的斜率推断为吸附溶质分子时,从吸附剂和溶质-改性剂复合物中置换的改性剂分子的总数。文献中报道的斜率通常大于 1。在这项研究中,我们测定了五种单价溶质(丙酮、环己酮、苯甲醛、苯乙醛和肉桂醛)在衍生多糖吸附剂(淀粉三[(S)-α-甲基苄基氨基甲酸酯]或 AS)上的保留因子,作为极性改性剂异丙醇(IPA)在正己烷(惰性溶剂)中的浓度的函数。每个溶质都有一个 CO 官能团,可与吸附剂 NH 基团和 IPA 的 OH 基团形成氢键。log-log 图的斜率为 0.25 至 0.45,小于 1,这不能用文献中的置换模型来解释。红外光谱和密度泛函理论模拟的结果清楚地表明了丙酮-IPA 络合和 IPA 聚集的证据,平均聚集数 n=3。开发了一种新的热力学保留模型,以考虑 IPA 聚集、IPA-溶质络合和竞争吸附。无量纲组分析表明,IPA 的聚集可导致斜率 B 小于 1,即使在高 IPA 浓度下也是如此。模型参数(IPA 聚集数和平衡常数)是根据不同 IPA 浓度下的保留因子估算的。保留模型和参数进一步通过动态色谱模拟进行验证。结果表明,聚集导致 IPA 单体浓度显著降低,从而影响 IPA-吸附剂结合和 IPA-溶质络合。因此,在高 IPA 浓度下,log-log 图的斜率接近无络合时的 1/n,或络合时的 2/n。五个手性溶质之间的 B 变化可能归因于溶质-IPA 络合的强度不同。因此,在解释保留因子和吸附机制时,用于解释保留因子和吸附机制的保留模型中必须考虑流动相中极性改性剂的络合和聚集。