• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经左结肠前型远端麦氏预防性灌肠——是否更优?

The distal left Malone antegrade continence enema--is it better?

机构信息

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

J Urol. 2013 Oct;190(4 Suppl):1529-33. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.092. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.092
PMID:23376708
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Malone antegrade continence enema is used for refractory fecal dysfunction in the pediatric neuropathic population. While various locations along the colon have been described, the optimal site for achieving efficient enemas remains unknown. We reviewed our experience with the Malone antegrade continence enema procedure and investigated functional outcomes and complications associated with proximal and distal locations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an institutional review board approved, retrospective chart review of 109 consecutive MACE procedures done by a single surgeon from 2000 to 2012. Preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative techniques and postoperative outcomes were reviewed and statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Included in analysis were 90 patients treated with a total of 109 MACE procedures. Average age at operation was 13.8 years. Myelomeningocele was the most common diagnosis. Most patients underwent simultaneous urinary reconstruction. Stomal complications were most common (49% of patients). We compared the outcomes of proximal (cecal) MACE in 48 cases and distal (sigmoid colon) MACE in 55. Location did not affect the overall efficiency of fecal continence. Flush time was shorter for distal than for proximal MACE stomas (37.2 vs 61.2 minutes, p <0.001). Of the patients 15 underwent a total of 20 complete MACE revisions, including 12 proximal and 6 distal MACEs. As a channel, appendix was associated with a higher but not statistically significant stomal complication rate compared to colon (42% vs 25%).

CONCLUSIONS

A cecal, transverse or colonic location for MACE results in acceptable outcomes. Distal MACE is associated with significantly shorter flush time and possibly fewer stomal complications. Stomal complications remain a frustrating reality of the MACE procedure.

摘要

目的

Malone 经肛顺行灌肠术用于治疗小儿神经性排便功能障碍。虽然结肠的各个部位都有描述,但实现高效灌肠的最佳部位仍不清楚。我们回顾了我们在 Malone 经肛顺行灌肠术方面的经验,并研究了近端和远端位置与功能结果和并发症的关系。

材料与方法

我们对 2000 年至 2012 年间由一位外科医生进行的 109 例连续 MACE 手术进行了机构审查委员会批准的回顾性图表审查。回顾了术前患者特征、术中技术和术后结果,并进行了统计学分析。

结果

纳入分析的有 90 例患者,共进行了 109 例 MACE 手术。手术时平均年龄为 13.8 岁。最常见的诊断是脊髓脊膜膨出。大多数患者同时进行了尿流重建。造口并发症最常见(49%的患者)。我们比较了近端(盲肠)MACE 组 48 例和远端(乙状结肠)MACE 组 55 例的结果。位置不影响粪便控便的总体效率。远端 MACE 的冲洗时间比近端 MACE 短(37.2 分钟比 61.2 分钟,p <0.001)。15 例患者共进行了 20 例 MACE 完全翻修,包括 12 例近端和 6 例远端 MACE。作为一种通道,阑尾与结肠相比,造口并发症发生率较高,但无统计学意义(42%比 25%)。

结论

MACE 的盲肠、横结肠或结肠位置可获得可接受的结果。远端 MACE 冲洗时间更短,可能造口并发症更少。造口并发症仍然是 MACE 手术的一个令人沮丧的现实。

相似文献

1
The distal left Malone antegrade continence enema--is it better?经左结肠前型远端麦氏预防性灌肠——是否更优?
J Urol. 2013 Oct;190(4 Suppl):1529-33. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.092. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
2
Assessment of pediatric Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) complications: Effects of variations in technique.小儿马龙顺行性节制灌肠术(MACE)并发症的评估:技术差异的影响
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Aug;12(4):246.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 May 20.
3
The Malone antegrade continence enema: single institutional review.马龙顺行性节制灌肠术:单机构回顾
J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):1106-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.062. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
4
The colon flap/extension Malone antegrade continence enema: an alternative to the Monti-Malone antegrade continence enema.结肠瓣/延长马龙顺行性节制灌肠术:蒙蒂-马龙顺行性节制灌肠术的替代方法。
J Urol. 2005 Jul;174(1):299-302. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000161215.67278.99.
5
Pre-operative risk factors for stomal stenosis with Malone antegrade continence enema procedures.经 Malone 顺行性控便灌肠术的造口狭窄术前危险因素。
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Dec;13(6):631.e1-631.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jul 9.
6
The Macedo-Malone antegrade continence enema procedure: early experience.马塞多-马龙顺行性可控灌肠术:早期经验
J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1340-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000149678.36915.fe.
7
Laparoscopic antegrade continence enema in situ appendix procedure for refractory constipation and overflow fecal incontinence in children with spina bifida.腹腔镜原位阑尾顺行性节制灌肠术治疗脊柱裂患儿难治性便秘和充溢性大便失禁
J Urol. 2000 Sep;164(3 Pt 2):1084-7. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200009020-00041.
8
Long-term outcomes of a Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) for the treatment of fecal incontinence or constipation in adults.马龙顺行性节制灌肠术(MACE)治疗成人大便失禁或便秘的长期疗效。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;33(10):1341-1348. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3088-5. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
9
Malone antegrade continence enema: Is cecal imbrication essential?马龙经肛门顺行性灌肠术:盲肠套叠是否必要?
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Dec;14(6):546.e1-546.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
10
Factors that influence outcomes of the Mitrofanoff and Malone antegrade continence enema reconstructive procedures in children.影响儿童米氏术式和马龙顺行性可控灌肠重建手术效果的因素。
J Urol. 2002 Oct;168(4 Pt 1):1537-40; discussion 1540. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64515-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.当前粪便失禁的治疗管理:选择治疗方案以优化治疗结局。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 28;19(48):9216-30. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9216.