Sampaio Rute, Pereira M Graça, Winck João C
School of Psychology, Minho University, Braga, Portugal,
Sleep Breath. 2013 Dec;17(4):1145-58. doi: 10.1007/s11325-013-0814-7. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
The aim of this study was to examine the joint role of demographic, clinical, psychological and family coping variables as predictors of adherence patterns to auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP).
A total of 153 patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) were assessed during a 6-months APAP treatment period. All patients underwent psychological evaluation prior to treatment (T1) and 1 to 3 months (T2) and 4 to 6 months (T3) post-APAP treatment. Of these, 107 patients maintained a stable adherence pattern to APAP during the treatment period.
Forty-seven percent were poorly adherent, 27 % were moderately adherent and 26 % were optimally adherent OSAS patients. Several factors distinguished the three adherence patterns and some of these emerged as the main predictors. In T1, the first model included age, apnea-hypopnea index, outcome expectations and coping spiritual support, as main predictors to distinguish adherence patterns. In T2 and T3, two models emerged adjusted to the variables of model 1 that included leakage, self-efficacy, mobilizing family acquire/accept support and reframing in model 2 and self-efficacy in model 3. Generally, the areas under the ROC curve, presented a good discrimination.
Findings revealed an integrative heuristic model that accounted for the joint influence of demographic, clinical, psychological, and family coping factors on poor, moderate, and optimal adherence patterns.
本研究旨在探讨人口统计学、临床、心理和家庭应对变量作为自动调压气道正压通气(APAP)依从模式预测因素的联合作用。
在为期6个月的APAP治疗期间,对总共153例被诊断为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)的患者进行了评估。所有患者在治疗前(T1)以及APAP治疗后1至3个月(T2)和4至6个月(T3)均接受了心理评估。其中,107例患者在治疗期间对APAP保持稳定的依从模式。
47%的患者依从性差,27%的患者依从性中等,26%的OSAS患者依从性最佳。有几个因素区分了这三种依从模式,其中一些因素成为主要预测因素。在T1时,第一个模型纳入年龄、呼吸暂停低通气指数、结果期望和应对精神支持,作为区分依从模式的主要预测因素。在T2和T3时,出现了两个根据模型1的变量进行调整的模型,模型2纳入漏气、自我效能感、动员家庭获得/接受支持和重新构建,模型3纳入自我效能感。总体而言,ROC曲线下面积显示出良好的区分度。
研究结果揭示了一个综合启发式模型,该模型解释了人口统计学、临床、心理和家庭应对因素对依从性差、中等和最佳依从模式的联合影响。