Department of Traumatology and Critical Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Crit Care Med. 2013 May;41(5):1186-96. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827ca4c8.
Encouraging results of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with refractory cardiac arrest have been shown. However, the independent impact on the neurologic outcome remains unknown in the out-of-hospital population. Our objective was to compare the neurologic outcome following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation and determine potential predictors that can identify candidates for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin.
Post hoc analysis of data from a prospective observational cohort.
A tertiary care university hospital in Sapporo, Japan (January 2000 to September 2004).
A total of 162 adult patients with witnessed cardiac arrest of cardiac origin who had undergone cardiopulmonary resuscitation for longer than 20 minutes (53 in the extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation group and 109 in the conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation group).
None.
The primary endpoint was neurologically intact survival at three months after cardiac arrest. We used propensity score matching to reduce selection bias and balance the baseline characteristics and clinical variables that could potentially affect outcome. This matching process selected 24 patients from each group. The impact of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was estimated in matched patients. Intact survival rate was higher in the matched extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation group than in the matched conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation group (29.2% [7/24] vs. 8.3% [2/24], log-rank p = 0.018). According to the predictor analysis, only pupil diameter on hospital arrival was associated with neurologic outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.39 per 1-mm increase; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.78; p = 0.008).
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation can improve neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin; furthermore, pupil diameter on hospital arrival may be a key predictor to identify extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation candidates.
已经证明,体外心肺复苏术(extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation,ECPR)对难治性心脏骤停患者具有令人鼓舞的效果。然而,在院外人群中,其对神经功能结局的独立影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是比较 ECPR 和常规心肺复苏术(conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation,CCPR)后神经功能结局,并确定可识别院外心源性心脏骤停患者中 ECPR 候选者的潜在预测因素。
对一项前瞻性观察队列研究数据的事后分析。
日本札幌的一家三级护理大学医院(2000 年 1 月至 2004 年 9 月)。
共纳入 162 例接受心肺复苏时间超过 20 分钟的成年目击心源性心脏骤停患者(ECPR 组 53 例,CCPR 组 109 例)。
无。
主要终点为心脏骤停后 3 个月时神经功能完整的存活。我们使用倾向评分匹配来减少选择偏倚,并平衡可能影响结局的基线特征和临床变量。该匹配过程从每个组中选择了 24 例患者。在匹配患者中评估了 ECPR 的影响。在匹配的 ECPR 组中,完整存活的比例高于匹配的 CCPR 组(29.2%[7/24] vs. 8.3%[2/24],对数秩检验 p = 0.018)。根据预测分析,只有入院时的瞳孔直径与神经功能结局相关(调整后的危险比,每增加 1mm 增加 1.39;95%置信区间,1.09-1.78;p = 0.008)。
ECPR 可改善院外心源性心脏骤停后的神经功能结局;此外,入院时的瞳孔直径可能是识别 ECPR 候选者的关键预测因素。