Suppr超能文献

指南和质量指标:它们是否能改善社区获得性肺炎患者的结局?

Guidelines and quality measures: do they improve outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia?

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, West Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2013 Mar;27(1):71-86. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2012.11.001.

Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has a significant impact in terms of morbidity, mortality, and cost of care. Guidelines play an important role in the management of this disease, and evidence supporting the positive effects of guidelines on outcomes in patients with CAP is substantial. However, evidence supporting many of the CAP quality indicators is low, and pay-for-performance measures do not seem to influence clinically important outcomes. Future CAP quality indicators should incorporate evidence-based interventions.

摘要

社区获得性肺炎(CAP)在发病率、死亡率和医疗费用方面都有重大影响。指南在这种疾病的管理中起着重要作用,并且有大量证据支持指南对 CAP 患者结局的积极影响。然而,支持许多 CAP 质量指标的证据水平较低,并且按绩效付费措施似乎并不能影响临床重要结局。未来的 CAP 质量指标应纳入基于证据的干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验