Department of Surgery, Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
Int J Surg. 2013;11(3):223-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
Acute perforated peptic ulcer is a leading cause of generalized peritonitis and its management has continued to be a challenging task in our environment.
There is a paucity of published reports on acute perforated peptic ulcers in our environment. This study was conducted to evaluate the different pattern of risk factors clinical presentations, management and clinical outcome of patients with acute perforated peptic ulcer in our setting and to highlight the factors that continue to account for the high mortality and morbidity as seen here.
A retrospective study where data of seventy-six (76) patients managed for generalized peritonitis due to acute peptic ulcer perforation over a five year period (January 2006-December 2010) were retrieved from medical records of Enugu State University of Science and Technology Hospital (ESUTH). The patients' biodata, clinical and operative findings and treatment outcome were extracted and analysed, after institutional ethical approval was secured. All other cases of generalized peritonitis not traceable to acute peptic ulcer perforation were excluded from the study.
There were76 patients; 58 males and 18 females (M:F = 3.2:1) Their ages ranged from 20 to 80years with a mean of 39.5yr and SD ± 13.10years. Majority of the patients 49(64.4%) were 40years of age and below and only 24 (31.6%) had a previous history suggestive of chronic peptic ulcer disease. Twenty five (32.9%) patients presented within 24 h of onset of symptoms of perforation with a mortality of 8.0%. Slightly more than half of our patients 39(51.3%) presented between 24 and 48 h with mortality of 17.9%. Twelve patients (15.8%) presented between 48 and 72 h and the mortality in this group was 58.3%. The latter two groups accounted for most of the mortality in our series. All perforations were anterior perforations within the first 2.5 cm of the duodenum and all had simple closure with pedicled omental patch and peritoneal toilet with copious volumes of warm normal saline. Postoperatively all received Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy and proton pump inhibitors for at least two months.
Patient groups who presented early had low mortality rates, but patient groups who presented late had higher mortality rates. Overall mortality was 21%.
急性穿孔性消化性溃疡是导致弥漫性腹膜炎的主要原因,其治疗在我们的环境中一直是一个具有挑战性的任务。
在我们的环境中,关于急性穿孔性消化性溃疡的报道很少。本研究旨在评估我们环境中急性穿孔性消化性溃疡患者的不同危险因素、临床表现、治疗方法和临床结果,并强调导致高死亡率和高发病率的因素。
这是一项回顾性研究,研究人员从埃努古州立科技大学医院(ESUTH)的病历中检索了 76 名(76 名)因急性消化性溃疡穿孔导致弥漫性腹膜炎的患者的数据,这些患者在 5 年期间(2006 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月)接受了治疗。研究人员提取并分析了患者的生物数据、临床和手术发现以及治疗结果,同时获得了机构伦理批准。所有其他无法追溯到急性消化性溃疡穿孔的弥漫性腹膜炎病例均被排除在研究之外。
共有 76 名患者,其中 58 名男性和 18 名女性(M:F=3.2:1),年龄 20-80 岁,平均年龄 39.5 岁,标准差±13.10 岁。大多数患者(49 名,64.4%)年龄在 40 岁以下,只有 24 名(31.6%)有提示慢性消化性溃疡病史的既往史。25 名(32.9%)患者在穿孔症状发作后 24 小时内就诊,死亡率为 8.0%。略多于一半的患者(39 名,51.3%)在 24 至 48 小时内就诊,死亡率为 17.9%。12 名(15.8%)患者在 48 至 72 小时内就诊,该组死亡率为 58.3%。后两组是我们研究中大多数死亡的原因。所有穿孔均在前 2.5 厘米的十二指肠内,均采用带蒂网膜补丁简单闭合,并使用大量温热生理盐水进行腹腔冲洗。术后所有患者均接受了幽门螺杆菌根除治疗和质子泵抑制剂治疗至少 2 个月。
早期就诊的患者死亡率较低,但晚期就诊的患者死亡率较高。总的死亡率为 21%。