Staffel J G, Hall J W, Grose J H, Pillsbury H C
Division of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina Medical School, Chapel Hill 27514.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Apr;87(4):1720-7. doi: 10.1121/1.399420.
NoSo and NoS pi detection thresholds for a 500-Hz pure-tone signal were measured as a function of masking noise bandwidth in normal-hearing and cochlear hearing-impaired subjects. NoSo and NoS pi critical bands were derived from the bandlimited noise functions. A notched noise measure of the monaural critical band was also obtained for each ear. One hypothesis tested was that an asymmetrical monaural critical band would result in a relatively steep improvement of the NoS pi detection threshold as a function of decreasing masker bandwidth and would, therefore, be associated with a wider binaural critical band. This was hypothesized because the outputs of the left and right auditory filters would be more decorrelated the greater the interaural difference in the monaural critical band. However, as the noise bandwidth was narrowed, the decorrelation would lessen, resulting in a relatively steep improvement in NoS pi detection. Results indicated that the masking level difference (MLD) was smaller and that the monaural critical bands were generally wider in cochlear-impaired listeners. NoSo and NoS pi critical bands were somewhat larger in the cochlear hearing-impaired listeners having relatively wide monaural critical bands. There was a significant correlation between monaural critical band asymmetry and the NoS pi critical band; however, this correlation was insignificant when a control was employed for the critical band in the worse ear. Therefore, the present results did not support a strong association between monaural critical band asymmetry and the width of the NoS pi critical band.
在听力正常和人工耳蜗听力受损的受试者中,测量了500赫兹纯音信号的NoSo和NoS pi检测阈值作为掩蔽噪声带宽的函数。NoSo和NoS pi临界带宽是从带限噪声函数中推导出来的。还为每只耳朵获得了单耳临界带宽的陷波噪声测量值。所检验的一个假设是,不对称的单耳临界带宽将导致NoS pi检测阈值随着掩蔽带宽的减小而相对急剧地改善,因此将与更宽的双耳临界带宽相关联。提出这一假设的原因是,单耳临界带宽的耳间差异越大,左右听觉滤波器的输出就越不相关。然而,随着噪声带宽变窄,去相关性会减弱,导致NoS pi检测有相对急剧的改善。结果表明,掩蔽级差(MLD)较小,人工耳蜗受损的听众单耳临界带宽通常更宽。在单耳临界带宽相对较宽的人工耳蜗听力受损听众中,NoSo和NoS pi临界带宽略大。单耳临界带宽不对称性与NoS pi临界带宽之间存在显著相关性;然而,当对较差耳朵的临界带宽进行控制时,这种相关性不显著。因此,目前的结果并不支持单耳临界带宽不对称性与NoS pi临界带宽宽度之间存在强关联。