Jiang B C, Scialfa C T, Tyrrell R A, Garvey P M, Leibowitz H W
College of Optometry, University of Houston, Texas.
Optom Vis Sci. 1990 Apr;67(4):260-7. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199004000-00006.
The contrast sensitivity function (CSF), although containing more information than traditional measures of acuity, has found difficulty gaining clinical acceptance. The hesitancy of clinicians to adopt the CSF stems, in part, from the fact that it is not as readily interpreted as is acuity. In order to facilitate such interpretation, five indices of spatial vision which are derivable from the CSF were examined in a sample of 287 persons aged 5 to 85 years. All indices were found to be both age-sensitive and strongly related to each other, but bandwidth of the CSF was chosen as a practical index for clinical settings. In a second study, acuity and CSF bandwidth were measured under 0 to +/- 1 D optical blur. It was found that the correction providing best acuity also maximized CSF bandwidth, and that bandwidth was more sensitive to optical blur than was acuity. Results support the assertion that CSF bandwidth is a readily interpreted index of spatial vision that can be measured efficiently within the context of clinical refraction.
对比敏感度函数(CSF)虽然比传统的视力测量方法包含更多信息,但在临床应用中却难以被接受。临床医生对采用CSF有所迟疑,部分原因在于它不像视力那样易于解读。为了便于解读,在287名年龄在5至85岁的人群样本中,研究了可从CSF得出的五个空间视觉指标。所有指标均被发现对年龄敏感且彼此高度相关,但CSF的带宽被选为临床环境中的实用指标。在第二项研究中,在0至±1D的光学模糊条件下测量了视力和CSF带宽。结果发现,提供最佳视力的矫正也能使CSF带宽最大化,并且带宽对光学模糊比视力更敏感。这些结果支持了这样的观点,即CSF带宽是一种易于解读的空间视觉指标,可在临床验光过程中有效测量。