School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Barber House, S10 2HQ, Sheffield, UK.
BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Feb 26;12:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-11.
The requirement to meet the palliative needs of acute hospital populations has grown in recent years. With increasing numbers of frail older people needing hospital care as a result of both malignant and non-malignant conditions, emphasis is being placed upon understanding the physical, psychological and social burdens experienced by patients. This study explores the extent of burden in two large UK hospitals, focusing upon those patients who meet palliative care criteria. Furthermore, the paper explores the use of palliative services and identifies the most significant clinical diagnostic and demographic factors which determine physical and psychological burden.
Two hospital surveys were undertaken to identify burden using the Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral to Care (SPARC). The Gold Standards Framework (GSF) is used to identify those patients meeting palliative care criteria. Participants were identified as being in-patients during a two-week data collection phase for each site. Data was gathered using face-to-face interviews or self-completion by patients or a proxy. Descriptive analyses highlight prevalence and use of palliative care provision. Binary logistic regression assesses clinical diagnostic predictor variables of physical and psychological burden.
The sample consisted of 514 patients and elevated physical, psychological and social burden is identified amongst those meeting palliative care criteria (n = 185). Tiredness (34.6%), pain (31.1%), weakness (28.8%) and psychological discomfort (low mood 19.9%; anxiety 16.1%) are noted as being prevalent. A small number of these participants accessed Specialist Palliative Care (8.2%). Dementia was identified as a predictor of physical (OR 3.94; p < .05) and psychological burden (OR 2.88; p < .05), being female was a predictor of psychological burden (OR 2.00; p < .05).
The paper highlights elevated levels of burden experienced by patients with palliative care requirements. Moreover, the paper also indicates that a large proportion of such patients are not in receipt of palliative approaches to their care. Furthermore, the paper identifies that those with non-malignant illnesses, especially dementia, may experience high levels of physical and psychological burden.
近年来,满足急性医院人群的姑息治疗需求的要求不断增加。由于恶性和非恶性疾病,越来越多的体弱老年人需要住院治疗,因此强调了解患者所经历的身体、心理和社会负担。本研究在英国的两家大型医院中探讨了负担的程度,重点关注符合姑息治疗标准的患者。此外,本文还探讨了姑息治疗服务的使用情况,并确定了决定身体和心理负担的最重要的临床诊断和人口统计学因素。
采用谢菲尔德评估和转介护理概况(SPARC)进行了两项医院调查,以确定负担。使用金标准框架(GSF)确定符合姑息治疗标准的患者。在每个地点的两周数据收集阶段,将参与者确定为住院患者。通过面对面访谈或患者或代理人的自我完成收集数据。描述性分析突出了姑息治疗服务的使用和提供情况。二元逻辑回归评估身体和心理负担的临床诊断预测变量。
该样本包括 514 名患者,符合姑息治疗标准的患者(n=185)存在明显的身体、心理和社会负担。疲劳(34.6%)、疼痛(31.1%)、虚弱(28.8%)和心理不适(情绪低落 19.9%;焦虑 16.1%)被认为是普遍存在的。只有少数这些参与者接受了专科姑息治疗(8.2%)。痴呆被确定为身体负担(OR 3.94;p<.05)和心理负担(OR 2.88;p<.05)的预测因素,女性是心理负担的预测因素(OR 2.00;p<.05)。
本文强调了符合姑息治疗需求的患者所经历的负担水平较高。此外,本文还表明,很大一部分此类患者未接受姑息治疗。此外,本文还指出,患有非恶性疾病,尤其是痴呆症的患者可能会经历较高水平的身体和心理负担。