Division of Surgical Oncology, Dewitt Daughtry Department of Surgery, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 May;20(5):1660-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2766-8. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
There is no consensus on the most effective modality for the treatment of resectable esophageal adenocarcinomas (EAC). We theorized that treatment modality may influence survival differently depending on the stage of disease.
A single-institution, retrospective examination of resectable EAC between 2000 and 2008 was performed. Resectable EAC were stratified into early disease (stage 2a or less) and late disease (stage 2b or more) based on pretreatment endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Patients with T4, >N2, and/or distant disease were excluded.
A total of 156 patients were included in this study. Most patients were white (97 %), male (83 %), and over 60 years of age (51 %). Patients with early disease on pretreatment EUS exhibited improved overall survival compared to patients with late disease (P < 0.001). Irrespective of treatment modality, there were no significant differences in overall 5-year survival for patients with early or late disease. Early and late disease patients whose disease responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) had significantly improved overall survival compared to nonresponsive disease (P < 0.05). The only negative independent predictors of overall 5-year survival were late stage disease on pretreatment EUS (hazard ratio 2.402, 95 % confidence interval 1.24-4.67, P = 0.01) and late stage disease on final pathological stage (hazard ratio 2.29, 95 % confidence interval 1.22-4.31, P = 0.01).
Our data lack statistical power but reveal no difference in survival with the addition of neoadjuvant therapies to surgery for early or late resectable EAC. However, patients with disease that responded to NAC had improved outcomes at 5 years for both groups. Therefore, the prognosis for patients undergoing NAC may be optimized by immediate surgical resection if neoadjuvant therapies do not result in a dramatic clinical response.
对于可切除的食管腺癌(EAC),哪种治疗方式最有效尚无定论。我们推测,治疗方式对不同疾病分期的生存影响可能不同。
回顾性分析了 2000 年至 2008 年间单一机构内可切除的 EAC 患者的临床资料。基于术前内镜超声(EUS),可切除的 EAC 患者被分为早期疾病(2a 期或更低分期)和晚期疾病(2b 期或更高分期)。排除 T4、N2 以上和/或远处转移的患者。
本研究共纳入 156 例患者。大多数患者为白人(97%)、男性(83%),年龄超过 60 岁(51%)。术前 EUS 显示早期疾病患者的总生存优于晚期疾病患者(P<0.001)。无论治疗方式如何,早期和晚期疾病患者的 5 年总生存率均无显著差异。对新辅助化疗(NAC)有反应的早期和晚期疾病患者的总生存明显优于无反应的疾病患者(P<0.05)。对 5 年总生存的唯一负独立预测因素是术前 EUS 的晚期疾病(风险比 2.402,95%置信区间 1.24-4.67,P=0.01)和最终病理分期的晚期疾病(风险比 2.29,95%置信区间 1.22-4.31,P=0.01)。
本研究数据的统计效能不足,但结果显示,在手术基础上增加新辅助治疗对早期和晚期可切除 EAC 的生存影响无差异。然而,对 NAC 有反应的患者在两组中 5 年的生存结果均有改善。因此,如果新辅助治疗没有显著的临床反应,对于接受 NAC 的患者,及时行手术切除可能会优化预后。