Jaimini Abhinav, Tripathi Madhavi, D'Souza Maria M, Panwar Puja, Sharma Rajnish, Mehta Saloni, Pandey Santosh, Saw Sanjiv, Singh Dinesh, Solanki Yachna, Mishra Anil K, Mondal Anupam
Division of Clinical PET, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences, Delhi, India.
Nucl Med Commun. 2013 May;34(5):426-31. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32835fcd7f.
The striatal-to-occipital ratio (SOR) is commonly used as an analytical parameter in L-3,4-dihydroxy-6-18F-fluorophenylalanine (FDOPA) PET studies. It has been shown to be useful in differentiating idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) patients from healthy individuals. We assessed the performance of SORs and subregional ratio of striatal-to-occipital ratios (RSORs) in the clinical assessment of nigrostriatal dopaminergic function for differentiating typical IPD from atypical parkinsonian disorders (APD).
A total of 117 patients referred from movement disorder clinics in speciality neurology centres underwent an FDOPA PET study and were kept under follow-up for at least 2 years. Sixty-five patients (43 IPD and 22 APD) completed the 2-year follow-up and were included in the final analysis. Their PET images were spatially normalized to occipital counts and analysed with three striatal subregional regions of interest (caudate, anterior putamen and posterior putamen) and two occipital regions of interest. The RSORs of the caudate and posterior putamen, the caudate and anterior putamen, the caudate and whole putamen and the anterior putamen and posterior putamen were also calculated and compared between the IPD and APD groups using the t-test.
The P values for these SORs were found to be insignificant between IPD and APD patients (caudate: 0.1325; anterior putamem: 0.5469; and posterior putamen: 0.9835). However, the RSORs of the caudate and posterior putamen showed significant differences between these two populations of patients.
The SOR method is already known to be a good diagnostic tool to differentiate between IPD patients and the normal population. SOR, however, fails to distinguish IPD from APD patients, and hence the RSOR of the caudate and posterior putamen can be utilized to differentiate between them.
纹状体与枕叶比值(SOR)在L-3,4-二羟基-6-18F-氟代苯丙氨酸(FDOPA)PET研究中常用作分析参数。已证明其有助于区分特发性帕金森病(IPD)患者与健康个体。我们评估了SOR以及纹状体与枕叶比值的亚区域比值(RSOR)在黑质纹状体多巴胺能功能临床评估中区分典型IPD与非典型帕金森综合征(APD)的性能。
共有117例来自专业神经科中心运动障碍门诊的患者接受了FDOPA PET研究,并进行了至少2年的随访。65例患者(43例IPD和22例APD)完成了2年随访并纳入最终分析。他们的PET图像进行空间归一化至枕叶计数,并使用三个纹状体亚区域感兴趣区(尾状核、壳核前部和壳核后部)和两个枕叶感兴趣区进行分析。还计算了尾状核与壳核后部、尾状核与壳核前部、尾状核与整个壳核以及壳核前部与壳核后部的RSOR,并使用t检验在IPD组和APD组之间进行比较。
发现这些SOR在IPD和APD患者之间的P值无统计学意义(尾状核:0.1325;壳核前部:0.5469;壳核后部:0.9835)。然而,尾状核与壳核后部的RSOR在这两组患者之间显示出显著差异。
已知SOR方法是区分IPD患者与正常人群的良好诊断工具。然而,SOR无法区分IPD与APD患者,因此尾状核与壳核后部的RSOR可用于区分它们。