Departments of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0558, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jun;56(12):1765-73. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit128. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
In clinical trials of complicated intra-abdominal infections, assessment of adequacy of the initial surgical approach to the management of the infection is of considerable importance in determining outcome. Antibiotic therapy would not be expected to adequately treat the infection if the surgical procedure was inadequate with respect to source control. Inclusion of such cases in an efficacy analysis of a particular therapeutic antibiotic may confound the results. We analyzed the source control review process used in double-blind clinical trials of antibiotics in complicated intra-abdominal infections identified through systematic review. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed) and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify relevant articles reporting results from double-blind clinical trials that used a source control review process. Eight prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, clinical trials of 5 anti-infective agents in complicated intra-abdominal infections used a source control review process. We provide recommendations for an independent, adjudicated source control review process applicable to future clinical trials.
在复杂腹腔内感染的临床试验中,评估初始手术方法对感染管理的充分性对于确定结果具有重要意义。如果手术程序在源控制方面不足,抗生素治疗预计无法充分治疗感染。在特定治疗抗生素的疗效分析中包括此类病例可能会使结果复杂化。我们通过系统评价分析了复杂腹腔内感染抗生素双盲临床试验中使用的源控制审查过程。我们在 MEDLINE(PubMed)和 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库中搜索了报告使用源控制审查过程的双盲临床试验结果的相关文章。八项前瞻性、随机、双盲、多中心、复杂腹腔内感染的抗感染药物临床试验使用了源控制审查过程。我们为未来临床试验提供了适用的独立、裁定的源控制审查过程的建议。