Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Ministry of Education Key Lab for Modern Toxicology, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057763. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified a number of genetic variants associated with lung cancer risk. However, these loci explain only a small fraction of lung cancer hereditability and other variants with weak effect may be lost in the GWAS approach due to the stringent significance level after multiple comparison correction. In this study, in order to identify important pathways involving the lung carcinogenesis, we performed a two-stage pathway analysis in GWAS of lung cancer in Han Chinese using gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) method. Predefined pathways by BioCarta and KEGG databases were systematically evaluated on Nanjing study (Discovery stage: 1,473 cases and 1,962 controls) and the suggestive pathways were further to be validated in Beijing study (Replication stage: 858 cases and 1,115 controls). We found that four pathways (achPathway, metPathway, At1rPathway and rac1Pathway) were consistently significant in both studies and the P values for combined dataset were 0.012, 0.010, 0.022 and 0.005 respectively. These results were stable after sensitivity analysis based on gene definition and gene overlaps between pathways. These findings may provide new insights into the etiology of lung cancer.
全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已经确定了许多与肺癌风险相关的遗传变异。然而,这些位点仅解释了肺癌遗传率的一小部分,由于多重比较校正后严格的显著性水平,GWAS 方法可能会丢失其他具有弱效应的变异。在这项研究中,为了确定涉及肺癌发生的重要途径,我们使用基因集富集分析(GSEA)方法对汉族人群的肺癌 GWAS 进行了两阶段途径分析。通过 BioCarta 和 KEGG 数据库预先定义的途径在南京研究(发现阶段:1473 例病例和 1962 例对照)中进行了系统评估,并且有提示意义的途径在进一步在北京研究(复制阶段:858 例病例和 1115 例对照)中进行了验证。我们发现四个途径(achPathway、metPathway、At1rPathway 和 rac1Pathway)在两项研究中均具有一致性,联合数据集的 P 值分别为 0.012、0.010、0.022 和 0.005。基于基因定义和途径之间的基因重叠进行敏感性分析后,这些结果仍然稳定。这些发现可能为肺癌的病因学提供新的见解。