Department of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85704, USA.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2013 Mar;37(1):15-27. doi: 10.1152/advan.00145.2012.
Society members whose research publication during the past 125 yr had an important impact on the discipline of physiology were featured at the American Physiological Society (APS)'s 125th Anniversary symposium. The daunting and challenging task of identifying and selecting significant publications was assumed by the Steering Committee of the History of Physiology Interest Group, who requested recommendations and rationales from all Sections, select Interest Groups, and active senior APS members. The request resulted in recommendations and rationales from nine Sections, one Interest Group, and 28 senior members, identifying 38 publications and 43 members for recognition purposes. The publication recommendations included 5 individuals (Cournand, Erlanger, Gasser, Hubel, and Wiesel) whose research significantly contributed to their selection for the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology, 4 individuals who received multiple recommendations [i.e., Cannon (3), Curran (2), Fenn (3), and Hamilton (2)], and 11 members who had been APS Presidents. Of the recommended articles, 33% were from the American Journal of Physiology, with the earliest being published in 1898 (Cannon) and the latest in 2007 (Sigmund). For the brief oral presentations, the History of Physiology Steering Committee selected the first choices of the Sections or Interest Group, whereas rationales and representation of the membership were used for the presentations by senior members.
在第 125 届美国生理学会(APS)周年纪念研讨会上,重点介绍了在过去 125 年中,其研究成果对生理学领域产生重要影响的学会成员。生理学史兴趣小组指导委员会承担了确定和选择重要出版物的艰巨而富有挑战性的任务,他们向所有分会、特定兴趣小组和活跃的资深 APS 成员征求建议和理由。这一请求得到了九个分会、一个兴趣小组和 28 名资深成员的建议和理由,共确定了 38 篇出版物和 43 名成员,以表彰他们的成就。出版物的推荐包括 5 位(Cournand、Erlanger、Gasser、Hubel 和 Wiesel)因其对诺贝尔医学或生理学奖的研究做出了重要贡献而被选中,4 位(Cannon、Curran、Fenn 和 Hamilton)获得了多项推荐,以及 11 位曾担任 APS 主席的成员。在所推荐的文章中,有 33%来自《美国生理学杂志》,最早的一篇发表于 1898 年(Cannon),最新的一篇发表于 2007 年(Sigmund)。对于简短的口头报告,生理学史指导委员会选择了分会或特定兴趣小组的第一选择,而资深成员则根据建议和成员代表性进行陈述。