Suppr超能文献

监管环境中的毛细管微量采样:生物分析毛细管微量采样方法的验证与应用

Capillary microsampling in the regulatory environment: validation and use of bioanalytical capillary microsampling methods.

作者信息

Nilsson Lars B, Ahnoff Martin, Jonsson Ove

机构信息

Analytical Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, BMC Box 574, SE-75123 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Bioanalysis. 2013 Mar;5(6):731-8. doi: 10.4155/bio.13.27.

Abstract

Capillary microsampling (CMS) has recently been introduced as a response to the demands for more ethical use of laboratory animals according to the 3R principles. In CMS, an exact volume of the blood, plasma or other biofluid is collected in a capillary from which it is washed out, resulting in a diluted sample that can be handled using the existing equipment in the bioanalytical laboratory. CMS differs from traditional large volume sampling as the microsample is diluted before further handling and analysis, and reanalysis is performed using the diluted sample. This has some implications for the validation and this report is an attempt to clarify how to validate and use CMS methods in a regulatory environment. CMS also shows some distinct new opportunities: labile analytes can be immediately stabilized at sample collection and the addition of the internal standard to the whole sample can improve analytical performance. The experiences from 5 years use of CMS of plasma and blood for determination of drug exposure in animal studies are reviewed.

摘要

毛细血管微量采样(CMS)最近被引入,以响应根据3R原则更符合伦理地使用实验动物的要求。在CMS中,从毛细血管中收集精确体积的血液、血浆或其他生物流体,然后将其冲洗出来,得到稀释后的样品,该样品可使用生物分析实验室的现有设备进行处理。CMS与传统的大量采样不同,因为微量样品在进一步处理和分析之前被稀释,并且使用稀释后的样品进行重新分析。这对验证有一些影响,本报告旨在阐明如何在监管环境中验证和使用CMS方法。CMS还展现出一些独特的新机遇:不稳定的分析物在样品采集时可立即稳定下来,并且向整个样品中添加内标可以提高分析性能。本文回顾了在动物研究中使用CMS采集血浆和血液进行药物暴露测定的5年经验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验