Arthritis Center Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente & University Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2013 May;25(3):354-9. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32835f6928.
This era of early aggressive treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) calls for criteria that allow timely classification of patients at risk of persistent erosive disease. We review how the new American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria meet up to this challenge.
The new 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA were developed using initiation of methotrexate as anchor in a population with undifferentiated arthritis. Many studies from different countries have now been published that have addressed the performances of these new criteria.
The goal of earlier classification of RA seems to be met with the new criteria, but exclusion of other diagnoses is essential. Increased sensitivity comes at the price of loss of specificity and indiscriminate use of these classification criteria as a diagnostic tool carries the risk of overtreatment.
类风湿关节炎(RA)的早期积极治疗时代要求有标准,以允许及时对持续性侵蚀性疾病风险患者进行分类。我们回顾了新的美国风湿病学会(ACR)/欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)分类标准如何应对这一挑战。
新的 2010 ACR/EULAR RA 分类标准是在未分化关节炎人群中以甲氨蝶呤为基础建立的。现在已经发表了许多来自不同国家的研究,探讨了这些新标准的性能。
新的标准似乎满足了更早分类 RA 的目标,但排除其他诊断至关重要。敏感性的提高是以特异性的损失为代价的,并且将这些分类标准不加区别地用作诊断工具存在过度治疗的风险。