Jefferson Headache Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Jul;29(7):861-7. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.787980. Epub 2013 May 22.
Many efficacy endpoints have been used in clinical trials of acute migraine pharmacotherapy. Headache response or headache relief (i.e., moderate/severe pain reduced to mild/no pain) at a single, specified time-point, traditionally the primary endpoint, and headache recurrence (i.e., return of pain after initial postdose relief) are inadequate. Headache relief does not provide information about pain-free response and counts a partial response as a treatment success. Headache recurrence can reflect sustained efficacy but is confounded by initial response to treatment, because ineffective drugs have low recurrence rates. The International Headache Society (IHS) guidelines state that 2 hour pain-free response and sustained pain-free response (i.e., freedom from pain with no recurrence or use of rescue or study medication 2-24 hours postdose) provide the most clinically relevant information about the efficacy of migraine pharmacotherapy. The pain-free criterion counts partial responses as failures and thus is a more rigorous test of therapeutic benefit than headache relief, and the two endpoints together incorporate the main treatment attributes that determine patient satisfaction. As an example, consider needle-free subcutaneous sumatriptan and oral triptan tablets. An open-label study of needle-free subcutaneous sumatriptan by Cady and colleagues found that 2 hour pain-free response and sustained pain-free response were 64% and 42% respectively. For oral triptan tablets, the 2001 metaanalysis by Ferrari and colleagues reported 2 hour pain-free response rates ranging from 23% to 38% and sustained pain-free response rates ranging from 11% to 26%. The measures of pain-free response 2 hours postdose and sustained pain-free response can differentiate among treatments and be used to guide therapeutic choices.
许多疗效终点已被用于急性偏头痛药物治疗的临床试验。头痛反应或头痛缓解(即,从重度/中度疼痛减轻至轻度/无疼痛)在单一的特定时间点,传统上是主要终点,以及头痛复发(即,初始缓解后疼痛再次出现)是不够的。头痛缓解不能提供无疼痛反应的信息,并将部分反应计为治疗成功。头痛复发可以反映持续疗效,但受到初始治疗反应的影响,因为无效药物的复发率较低。国际头痛协会(IHS)指南指出,2 小时无疼痛反应和持续无疼痛反应(即,在初始缓解后 2-24 小时无疼痛,无复发或使用救援或研究药物)提供了关于偏头痛药物治疗疗效的最相关的临床信息。无疼痛标准将部分反应计为失败,因此是对治疗益处的更严格测试,而这两个终点结合了决定患者满意度的主要治疗属性。例如,考虑无针皮下舒马曲坦和口服曲坦片。Cady 及其同事进行的一项无针皮下舒马曲坦的开放标签研究发现,2 小时无疼痛反应和持续无疼痛反应分别为 64%和 42%。对于口服曲坦片,Ferrari 及其同事在 2001 年进行的荟萃分析报告称,2 小时无疼痛反应率从 23%到 38%不等,持续无疼痛反应率从 11%到 26%不等。2 小时后无疼痛反应和持续无疼痛反应的测量可以区分治疗方法,并可用于指导治疗选择。