Smith Aynsley M, Stuart Michael J, Greenwald Richard M, Benson Brian W, Dodick David W, Emery Carolyn, Finnoff Jonathan T, Mihalik Jason P, Roberts William O, Sullivan Carol-Anne, Meeuwisse Willem H
Mayo Clinic, Sports Medicine Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2011 Jul;10(4):241-7. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e318224624a.
The objective of this proceeding is to integrate the concussion in sport literature and sport science research on safety in ice hockey to develop an action plan to reduce the risk, incidence, severity, and consequences of concussion in ice hockey.
A rationale paper outlining a collaborative action plan to address concussions in hockey was posted for review two months prior to the Ice Hockey Summit: Action on Concussion. Focused presentations devoted specifically to concussion in ice hockey were presented during the Summit and breakout sessions were used to develop strategies to reduce concussion in the sport. This proceedings and a detailed scientific review (a matrix of solutions) were written to disseminate the evidence-based information and resulting concussion reduction strategies. The manuscripts were reviewed by the authors, advisors and contributors to ensure that the opinions and recommendations reflect the current level of knowledge on concussion in hockey.
Six components of a potential solution were articulated in the Rationale paper and became the topics for breakout groups that followed the professional, scientific lectures. Topics that formed the core of the action plan were: metrics and databases; recognizing, managing and return to play; hockey equipment and ice arenas; prevention and education; rules and regulations; and expedient communication of the outcomes. The attendees in breakout sessions identified action items for each section. The most highly ranked action items were brought to a vote in the open assembly, using an Audience Response System (ARS). The strategic planning process was conducted to assess: Where are we at?; Where must we get to?; and What strategies are necessary to make progress on the prioritized action items?
Three prioritized action items for each component of the solution and the percentage of the votes received are listed in the body of this proceeding.
本次会议的目的是整合体育文献中的脑震荡以及冰球运动安全方面的体育科学研究,以制定一项行动计划,降低冰球运动中脑震荡的风险、发生率、严重程度和后果。
在冰球峰会:脑震荡行动召开前两个月,发布了一篇阐述应对冰球运动脑震荡合作行动计划的理论依据文件以供审阅。在峰会期间专门进行了针对冰球运动脑震荡的重点发言,并通过分组讨论制定减少该运动中脑震荡的策略。撰写本次会议纪要和详细的科学综述(解决方案矩阵)以传播基于证据的信息和由此产生的减少脑震荡策略。这些稿件由作者、顾问和撰稿人进行审阅,以确保意见和建议反映当前冰球运动脑震荡的知识水平。
理论依据文件中明确了潜在解决方案的六个组成部分,并成为专业科学讲座之后分组讨论的主题。构成行动计划核心的主题有:指标与数据库;识别、管理与恢复比赛;冰球装备与冰场;预防与教育;规则与规定;以及结果的快速传达。分组讨论的参会者确定了每个部分的行动项目。排名最高的行动项目在公开会议上通过观众反应系统(ARS)进行投票表决。进行战略规划过程以评估:我们目前处于什么位置?;我们必须达到什么目标?;以及在优先行动项目上取得进展需要哪些策略?
本会议纪要正文中列出了针对解决方案每个组成部分的三个优先行动项目及其获得的投票百分比。