Curtin Health and Innovation Research Institute, School of Pharmacy, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Jun;35(3):469-75. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9766-z. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
Community pharmacies and hospitals are the two main professional areas for pharmacists. There is currently a lack of comparison of pharmacists working in these two distinct settings in relation to an expanded prescribing role.
To compare the attitudes of hospital and community pharmacists regarding an expanded prescribing role.
Australian pharmacists.
A self-administered postal survey was used to collect the data. Data analysis was performed using SPSS(®) v19. Kendall's tau-c test was used to compare the mean values between categorical variables (i.e. hospital or community pharmacists) and continuous variables measuring attitudes on a Likert scale (i.e. reasons in favour and barriers of pharmacist prescribing, preferred therapeutic areas of prescribing and prescribing models). A Chi square test was used to analyse categorical variables (i.e. demographics).
The opinion of hospital and community pharmacists regarding an expanded prescribing role.
A response rate of 40.4% was achieved (1,049/2,592). Where significant differences were located, community pharmacists were more supportive of all proffered potential reasons in favour of pharmacist prescribing (p < 0.05) whereas hospital pharmacists were more in agreement with all suggested barriers to such a role (p < 0.05). In a supplementary (collaborative) prescribing model, hospital pharmacists were more confident than community pharmacists in prescribing for heart failure (p < 0.001) and anticoagulant therapies (p = 0.004). In an independent prescribing model hospital pharmacists were more supportive of prescribing anticoagulant therapies (p = 0.002). Significant differences were found between the two groups in relation to their support for independent prescribing (p = 0.020) and extension of the emergency supply 3 days rule to 30 days (p = 0.011).
This study suggests that there are differences between hospital and community pharmacists in what they regard as potential reasons in favour of an expanded pharmacist prescribing role, perceived barriers to such a role and whether to prescribe independently of doctors. Hospital pharmacists' attitudinal differences in terms of support for certain therapeutic areas of prescribing reflects probably their existing active role in clinical decision making processes in patients who are often seriously ill.
社区药房和医院是药剂师的两个主要专业领域。目前,缺乏对在这两个截然不同的环境中工作的药剂师在扩大处方角色方面的比较。
比较医院和社区药剂师对扩大处方角色的态度。
澳大利亚药剂师。
采用自填式邮寄问卷调查收集数据。使用 SPSS(®)v19 进行数据分析。Kendall's tau-c 检验用于比较类别变量(即医院或社区药剂师)和连续变量(即赞成理由和处方障碍、首选处方治疗领域和处方模式)上的态度的平均值。卡方检验用于分析类别变量(即人口统计学)。
医院和社区药剂师对扩大处方角色的看法。
实现了 40.4%的回复率(1049/2592)。在发现显著差异的地方,社区药剂师更支持所有提出的赞成药剂师处方的潜在理由(p<0.05),而医院药剂师更同意所有提出的此类角色障碍(p<0.05)。在补充(协作)处方模式中,医院药剂师比社区药剂师更有信心为心力衰竭(p<0.001)和抗凝治疗(p=0.004)开处方。在独立处方模式下,医院药剂师更支持独立开抗凝治疗处方(p=0.002)。两组在支持独立处方(p=0.020)和将紧急供应 3 天规则延长至 30 天(p=0.011)方面存在显著差异。
本研究表明,医院和社区药剂师在他们认为扩大药剂师处方角色的潜在理由、对该角色的感知障碍以及是否独立于医生开处方等方面存在差异。医院药剂师在支持某些处方治疗领域方面的态度差异可能反映了他们在经常患有重病的患者的临床决策过程中目前的积极作用。