Suppr超能文献

基于父母的干预对饮酒转变的调节作用:在高风险和低风险的大一学生中检验规范认知和态度的作用。

Moderation of a parent-based intervention on transitions in drinking: examining the role of normative perceptions and attitudes among high- and low-risk first-year college students.

机构信息

Prevention Research Center , The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Sep;37(9):1587-94. doi: 10.1111/acer.12126. Epub 2013 Apr 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parent-based interventions (PBIs) are an effective strategy to reduce problematic drinking among first-year college students. The current study examined the extent to which student-based characteristics, derived from the Theory of Planned Behavior, moderated 3 PBI conditions: (i) prior to college matriculation (PCM); (ii) PCM with a booster during the fall semester; and (iii) after college matriculation. The moderator variables included injunctive and descriptive peer norms about alcohol use and attitudes toward alcohol use.

METHODS

Using data from a randomized control trial delivered to 1,900 incoming college students, we examined differential treatment effects within 4 types of baseline student drinkers: (i) nondrinkers; (ii) weekend light drinkers (WLD); (iii) weekend heavy episodic drinkers; and (iv) heavy drinkers. The outcome variable was based on the transitions in drinking that occurred between the summer prior to college enrollment and the end of the first fall semester and distinguished between students who transitioned to 1 of the 2 risky drinking classes.

RESULTS

The results indicated that injunctive norms (but not descriptive norms or attitudes) moderated the differential effects of the PBI with strongest effects for students whose parents received the booster. Differential effects also depended on baseline drinking class and were most pronounced among WLDs who were deemed "high-risk" in terms of injunctive peer norms.

CONCLUSIONS

Parental influence can remain strong for young adults who are transitioning to college environments, even among students with relatively high peer influence to drink alcohol. Thus, the PBI represents an effective tool to prevent escalation of alcohol use during the first year of college, when risk is highest and patterns of alcohol use are established.

摘要

背景

基于家长的干预(PBIs)是减少大一新生问题性饮酒的有效策略。本研究考察了计划行为理论(Theory of Planned Behavior)得出的学生特征在多大程度上调节了 3 种 PBI 条件:(i)大学入学前(PCM);(ii)PCM 与秋季学期的强化课程;(iii)大学入学后。调节变量包括关于酒精使用的规范性和描述性同伴规范以及对酒精使用的态度。

方法

利用一项针对 1900 名新生进行的随机对照试验的数据,我们在 4 种基线学生饮酒者类型中检查了不同的治疗效果:(i)不饮酒者;(ii)周末轻度饮酒者(WLD);(iii)周末重度间歇性饮酒者;(iv)重度饮酒者。因变量基于在大学入学前的夏天和第一学年秋季学期结束之间发生的饮酒转变,将其区分开那些转变为 2 种风险饮酒类型之一的学生。

结果

结果表明,规范(但不是描述性规范或态度)调节了 PBI 的差异效应,父母接受强化课程的学生效果最强。差异效应还取决于基线饮酒类型,在被认为在规范性同伴规范方面“高风险”的 WLD 中最为明显。

结论

即使在对饮酒具有较高同伴影响的学生中,父母的影响对于正在过渡到大学环境的年轻人来说仍然很强。因此,PBI 是预防大学第一年饮酒升级的有效工具,因为此时风险最高,并且建立了饮酒模式。

相似文献

4
Transitions in drinking behaviors across the college years: A latent transition analysis.
Addict Behav. 2019 May;92:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.12.021. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
5
A randomized trial of a parent-based intervention on drinking behavior among incoming college freshmen.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009 Jul(16):67-76. doi: 10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.67.
6
Associations of descriptive and reflective injunctive norms with risky college drinking.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Dec;27(4):1175-1181. doi: 10.1037/a0032828.
9
Disparity between the perceived alcohol-related attitudes of parents and peers increases alcohol risk in college students.
Addict Behav. 2010 Feb;35(2):135-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.09.019. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
10
Do my peers approve? Interest in injunctive norms feedback delivered online to college student drinkers.
Addict Behav. 2016 Jul;58:188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge and practice of harm-reduction behaviours for alcohol and other illicit substance use in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Feb;24(1):e51-e56. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxy075. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
5
7
Who Will Experience the Most Alcohol Problems in College? The Roles of Middle and High School Drinking Tendencies.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Oct;39(10):2039-46. doi: 10.1111/acer.12846. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
8
Latent Class Analysis of DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorder Criteria Among Heavy-Drinking College Students.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Oct;57:81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 May 16.
9
Examination of a dual-process model predicting riding with drinking drivers.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Jun;39(6):1075-82. doi: 10.1111/acer.12731. Epub 2015 May 2.
10
Longitudinal family effects on substance use among an at-risk adolescent sample.
Addict Behav. 2015 Feb;41:185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Oct 24.

本文引用的文献

3
4
Broad social motives, alcohol use, and related problems: Mechanisms of risk from high school through college.
Addict Behav. 2011 Mar;36(3):222-30. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
6
Perceived norms for drinking in the transition from high school to college and beyond.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010 Nov;71(6):895-903. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.895.
8
A randomized trial of a parent-based intervention on drinking behavior among incoming college freshmen.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009 Jul(16):67-76. doi: 10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.67.
9
A randomized clinical trial evaluating a combined alcohol intervention for high-risk college students.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009 Jul;70(4):555-67. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.555.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验