Prevention Research Center , The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 Sep;37(9):1587-94. doi: 10.1111/acer.12126. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
Parent-based interventions (PBIs) are an effective strategy to reduce problematic drinking among first-year college students. The current study examined the extent to which student-based characteristics, derived from the Theory of Planned Behavior, moderated 3 PBI conditions: (i) prior to college matriculation (PCM); (ii) PCM with a booster during the fall semester; and (iii) after college matriculation. The moderator variables included injunctive and descriptive peer norms about alcohol use and attitudes toward alcohol use.
Using data from a randomized control trial delivered to 1,900 incoming college students, we examined differential treatment effects within 4 types of baseline student drinkers: (i) nondrinkers; (ii) weekend light drinkers (WLD); (iii) weekend heavy episodic drinkers; and (iv) heavy drinkers. The outcome variable was based on the transitions in drinking that occurred between the summer prior to college enrollment and the end of the first fall semester and distinguished between students who transitioned to 1 of the 2 risky drinking classes.
The results indicated that injunctive norms (but not descriptive norms or attitudes) moderated the differential effects of the PBI with strongest effects for students whose parents received the booster. Differential effects also depended on baseline drinking class and were most pronounced among WLDs who were deemed "high-risk" in terms of injunctive peer norms.
Parental influence can remain strong for young adults who are transitioning to college environments, even among students with relatively high peer influence to drink alcohol. Thus, the PBI represents an effective tool to prevent escalation of alcohol use during the first year of college, when risk is highest and patterns of alcohol use are established.
基于家长的干预(PBIs)是减少大一新生问题性饮酒的有效策略。本研究考察了计划行为理论(Theory of Planned Behavior)得出的学生特征在多大程度上调节了 3 种 PBI 条件:(i)大学入学前(PCM);(ii)PCM 与秋季学期的强化课程;(iii)大学入学后。调节变量包括关于酒精使用的规范性和描述性同伴规范以及对酒精使用的态度。
利用一项针对 1900 名新生进行的随机对照试验的数据,我们在 4 种基线学生饮酒者类型中检查了不同的治疗效果:(i)不饮酒者;(ii)周末轻度饮酒者(WLD);(iii)周末重度间歇性饮酒者;(iv)重度饮酒者。因变量基于在大学入学前的夏天和第一学年秋季学期结束之间发生的饮酒转变,将其区分开那些转变为 2 种风险饮酒类型之一的学生。
结果表明,规范(但不是描述性规范或态度)调节了 PBI 的差异效应,父母接受强化课程的学生效果最强。差异效应还取决于基线饮酒类型,在被认为在规范性同伴规范方面“高风险”的 WLD 中最为明显。
即使在对饮酒具有较高同伴影响的学生中,父母的影响对于正在过渡到大学环境的年轻人来说仍然很强。因此,PBI 是预防大学第一年饮酒升级的有效工具,因为此时风险最高,并且建立了饮酒模式。