Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Surgery, s Gravendijkwal 230, Room z-835, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
JAMA Surg. 2013 Mar;148(3):259-63. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1466.
Incisional hernia is the most frequent surgical complication after laparotomy. Up to 30% of all patients undergoing laparotomy develop an incisional hernia.
To compare laparoscopic vs open ventral incisional hernia repair with regard to postoperative pain and nausea, operative results, perioperative and postoperative complications, hospital admission, and recurrence rate.
Multicenter randomized controlled trial between May 1999 and December 2006 with a mean follow-up period of 35 months.
All patients were operated on in a clinical setting at 1 of the 2 participating university medical centers or at the other 8 teaching hospitals.
Two hundred six patients from 10 hospitals were randomized equally to laparoscopic or open mesh repair. Patients with an incisional hernia larger than 3 cm and smaller than 15 cm, either primary or recurrent, were included. Patients were excluded if they had an open abdomen treatment in their medical histories.
Laparoscopic or open ventral incisional hernia repair.
The primary outcome of the trial was postoperative pain. Secondary outcomes were use of analgesics, perioperative and postoperative complications, operative time, postoperative nausea, length of hospital stay, recurrence, morbidity, and mortality.
Median blood loss during the operation was significantly less (10 mL vs 50 mL; P = .05) as well as the number of patients receiving a wound drain (3% vs. 45%; P < .001) in the laparoscopic group. Operative time for the laparoscopic group was longer (100 minutes vs. 76 minutes; P = .001). Perioperative complications were significantly higher after laparoscopy (9% vs. 2%). Visual analog scale scores for pain and nausea, completed before surgery and 3 days and 1 and 4 weeks postoperatively, showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. At a mean follow-up period of 35 months, a recurrence rate of 14% was reported in the open group and 18%, in the laparoscopic group (P = .30). The size of the defect was found to be an independent predictor for recurrence (P < .001).
During the operation, there was less blood loss and less need for a wound drain in the laparoscopic group. However, operative time was longer during laparoscopy. Perioperative complications were significantly higher in the laparoscopic group. Visual analog scores for pain and nausea did not differ between groups. The incidence of a recurrence was similar in both groups. The size of the defect was found to be an independent factor for recurrence of an incisional hernia.
切口疝是剖腹手术后最常见的手术并发症。多达 30%接受剖腹手术的患者会发生切口疝。
比较腹腔镜与开放式腹侧切口疝修补术在术后疼痛和恶心、手术结果、围手术期和术后并发症、住院时间和复发率方面的差异。
1999 年 5 月至 2006 年 12 月进行的多中心随机对照试验,平均随访时间为 35 个月。
所有患者均在参与的 2 家大学医学中心或其他 8 家教学医院的临床环境中进行手术。
10 家医院的 206 名患者被随机分为腹腔镜或开放式网片修补组,纳入原发性或复发性切口疝,疝大小大于 3cm 且小于 15cm。排除既往有开放性腹部治疗史的患者。
腹腔镜或开放式腹侧切口疝修补术。
试验的主要结局是术后疼痛。次要结局包括镇痛药的使用、围手术期和术后并发症、手术时间、术后恶心、住院时间、复发、发病率和死亡率。
术中出血量明显减少(10ml 比 50ml;P=0.05),腹腔镜组接受伤口引流的患者比例也明显减少(3%比 45%;P<0.001)。腹腔镜组的手术时间更长(100 分钟比 76 分钟;P=0.001)。腹腔镜组的围手术期并发症发生率显著更高(9%比 2%)。术前、术后 3 天及 1 周和 4 周完成的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛和恶心评分在两组间无显著差异。在平均 35 个月的随访期间,开放式组的复发率为 14%,腹腔镜组为 18%(P=0.30)。缺损大小被发现是复发的独立预测因素(P<0.001)。
术中,腹腔镜组的出血量较少,伤口引流需求较低。然而,腹腔镜组的手术时间较长。腹腔镜组的围手术期并发症发生率显著更高。两组间的疼痛和恶心 VAS 评分无差异。两组的复发发生率相似。缺损大小是切口疝复发的独立因素。