Department of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9070, USA.
Hippocampus. 2013 Aug;23(8):708-19. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22130. Epub 2013 May 17.
Radial glia-like cells (RGCs) are the hypothesized source of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. However, the current model of hippocampal neurogenesis does not fully incorporate the in vivo heterogeneity of RGCs. In order to better understand the contribution of different RGC subtypes to adult hippocampal neurogenesis, we employed widely used transgenic lines (Nestin-CreER(T2) and GLAST::CreER(T2) mice) to explore how RGCs contribute to neurogenesis under basal conditions and after stimulation and depletion of neural progenitor cells. We first used these inducible fate-tracking transgenic lines to define the similarities and differences in the contribution of nestin- and GLAST-lineage cells to basal long-term hippocampal neurogenesis. We then explored the ability of nestin- and GLAST-lineage RGCs to contribute to neurogenesis after experimental manipulations that either ablate neurogenesis (i.c.v. application of the anti-mitotic AraC, cytosine-β-D-arabinofuranoside) or stimulate neurogenesis (wheel running). Interestingly, in both ablation and stimulation experiments, labeled RGCs in GLAST::CreER(T2) mice appear to contribute to neurogenesis, whereas RGCs in Nestin-CreER(T2) mice do not. Finally, using NestinGFP reporter mice, we expanded on previous research by showing that not all RGCs in the adult dentate gyrus subgranular zone express nestin, and therefore RGCs are antigenically heterogeneous. These findings are important for the field, as they allow appropriately conservative interpretation of existing and future data that emerge from these inducible transgenic lines. These findings also raise important questions about the differences between transgenic driver lines, the heterogeneity of RGCs, and the potential differences in progenitor cell behavior between transgenic lines. As these findings highlight the possible differences in the contribution of cells to long-term neurogenesis in vivo, they indicate that the current models of hippocampal neurogenesis should be modified to include RGC lineage heterogeneity.
放射状胶质样细胞(RGCs)被认为是成年海马神经发生的来源。然而,目前的海马神经发生模型并没有完全纳入 RGCs 的体内异质性。为了更好地了解不同 RGC 亚型对成年海马神经发生的贡献,我们使用了广泛使用的转基因系(Nestin-CreER(T2)和 GLAST::CreER(T2)小鼠)来探索 RGCs 在基础条件下以及在神经祖细胞刺激和耗竭后如何促进神经发生。我们首先使用这些诱导型命运追踪转基因系来定义巢蛋白和 GLAST 谱系细胞对基础长期海马神经发生的贡献的相似性和差异性。然后,我们探索了巢蛋白和 GLAST 谱系 RGC 在实验操作后促进神经发生的能力,这些操作要么消除神经发生(侧脑室应用抗有丝分裂 AraC、胞嘧啶-β-D-阿拉伯呋喃糖苷),要么刺激神经发生(跑步轮)。有趣的是,在消除和刺激实验中,GLAST::CreER(T2)小鼠中的标记 RGC 似乎有助于神经发生,而 Nestin-CreER(T2)小鼠中的 RGC 则没有。最后,使用 NestinGFP 报告小鼠,我们扩展了之前的研究,表明成年齿状回颗粒下区的并非所有 RGC 都表达巢蛋白,因此 RGC 具有抗原异质性。这些发现对该领域很重要,因为它们允许对这些诱导型转基因系产生的现有和未来数据进行适当保守的解释。这些发现还提出了关于转基因驱动系之间的差异、RGC 异质性以及转基因系之间祖细胞行为潜在差异的重要问题。由于这些发现强调了细胞对体内长期神经发生的贡献可能存在差异,因此表明目前的海马神经发生模型应该进行修改,以纳入 RGC 谱系异质性。