Becker Richard, Butenas Saulius, Carr Marcus, Jaffer Farouc, Kleiman Neal S, Marmur Jonathan D, Schneider David J, Spiess Bruce D, Steinhubl Steven R, Weitz Jeffrey I
Coronary Care Unit, University of Massachusetts Medical School, USA.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2003 Aug;Suppl:2-15.
Our current understanding of hemostasis and the roles of coagulation and platelets has evolved in recent years from the old "coagulation cascade" and "platelet pathway" models to an inter-related, cell-based model that more accurately represents in-vivo processes and better reflects clinical observations. The new model makes it apparent that thrombin is a key effector and modulator of hemostasis, and that activation of coagulation and platelets cannot be viewed as separate processes. Thrombin is a potent platelet agonist, and recent data indicate that thrombin may be the most critical activator of tissue-factor-induced thrombosis. Minute quantities of thrombin generated at the site of plaque disruption or arterial injury activates platelets and amplifies its own production, resulting in an explosive burst of thrombin production after clot formation. Thrombin-induced activation of platelets and other cells may contribute to inflammatory processes that are increasingly recognized as playing an important role in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and coronary interventions. Along with a clearer understanding of the biology of thrombosis and hemostasis, better methods for studying the mechanisms of coagulation and platelet activation and the interaction of these processes in vivo have provided a new understanding of the method by which antithrombotic agents work. The physiological basis of thrombosis and hemostasis has important implications for treatment strategies in ACS, and for outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). With this increased understanding, the limitations of heparin and the advantages of the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin (Angiomax, The Medicines Company) become apparent--providing a mechanistic rationale for the clinical benefit recently demonstrated in the Randomized Evaluation of PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE-2) PCI trial.
近年来,我们对止血以及凝血和血小板作用的理解已从旧的“凝血级联”和“血小板途径”模型发展为相互关联的、基于细胞的模型,该模型更准确地反映了体内过程,也更好地体现了临床观察结果。新模型表明,凝血酶是止血的关键效应器和调节剂,并且凝血和血小板的激活不能被视为相互独立的过程。凝血酶是一种强效的血小板激动剂,最近的数据表明,凝血酶可能是组织因子诱导血栓形成的最关键激活剂。在斑块破裂或动脉损伤部位产生的微量凝血酶激活血小板并放大其自身的产生,导致血栓形成后凝血酶产生的爆发性增加。凝血酶诱导的血小板和其他细胞的激活可能会促进炎症过程,而炎症过程在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)和冠状动脉介入治疗中发挥重要作用这一点正日益得到认可。随着对血栓形成和止血生物学的更清晰理解,研究凝血和血小板激活机制以及这些过程在体内相互作用的更好方法,为抗血栓药物的作用方式提供了新的认识。血栓形成和止血的生理基础对ACS的治疗策略以及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的结果具有重要意义。随着这种认识的增加,肝素的局限性和直接凝血酶抑制剂比伐卢定(Angiomax,医药公司)的优势变得明显——这为最近在将Angiomax与减少临床事件相关联的PCI随机评估(REPLACE - 2)PCI试验中所证明的临床益处提供了一个机制上的理论依据。