Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-UNAM, Ant. Carr. a Pátzcuaro 8701, Col. Ex-Hda. de San José de la Huerta, 58190 Morelia, Michoacán, México.
Syst Biol. 2013 Jul;62(4):555-73. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt021. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
An area of endemism is defined by the spatial congruence among two or more species with distributions that are limited by barriers. In this study, we explored and discussed the use of the network analysis method (NAM) and neighbor-joining (NJ) to analyze the areas of endemism of Quercus sect. Lobatae (red oak species) in Mexico and Central America. We compared the NAM and NJ with other methods commonly used in biogeographic studies to show the advantages of these new approaches and to identify the shortcomings of other approaches. The NAM used in this study is based on notions of centrality measures, such as betweenness. We incorporated the strength of the ties within the internal networks through p-cores and aggregate constraints in iterative analyses. The NAM based on betweenness is ideal for recognizing completely allopatric areas of endemism. The iterative NAMs increase the number of possible areas of endemism because they minimize the effect of minimal overlap, and the p-core is efficient at identifying the closest relationships among species in the cases in which betweenness is not informative. The number of areas of endemism increases when the sympatry matrix minimizes the dispersal effect and the sample effort is maximized, allowing the identification of the greatest number of these areas. The NJ method supports the idea that areas diverge among themselves in a differential way; the long branches correspond to zones with high speciation rates and complex histories (biotic and tectonic), and the short branches correspond to zones with low speciation rates and simple histories. In a classification scheme, NJ was capable of identifying the areas that are considered biotically complex because of their high speciation rates. The results obtained with the NAM and NJ showed that the physiographic regions of Mexico are not natural units and that many of them are composed of at least two different biotic components.
一个特有区域是由两个或更多分布受限于障碍的物种的空间一致性来定义的。在本研究中,我们探索并讨论了使用网络分析方法(NAM)和邻接法(NJ)来分析墨西哥和中美洲栎属(红橡木物种)特有区域。我们比较了 NAM 和 NJ 与生物地理研究中常用的其他方法,以展示这些新方法的优势,并确定其他方法的缺点。本研究中使用的 NAM 基于中心性度量的概念,例如介数。我们通过在迭代分析中包含 p-核心和聚合约束,将内部网络中的联系强度纳入其中。基于介数的 NAM 非常适合识别完全异地分布的特有区域。迭代 NAM 增加了可能的特有区域的数量,因为它们最小化了最小重叠的影响,而 p-核心在介数不具有信息量的情况下,能够有效地识别物种之间最接近的关系。当同域矩阵最小化扩散效应且样本努力最大化时,特有区域的数量会增加,从而可以识别出这些区域的最大数量。NJ 方法支持这样一种观点,即特有区域以不同的方式彼此分歧;长分支对应于具有高物种形成率和复杂历史(生物和构造)的区域,而短分支对应于具有低物种形成率和简单历史的区域。在分类方案中,NJ 能够识别由于高物种形成率而被认为是生物复杂的区域。NAM 和 NJ 的结果表明,墨西哥的地貌区域不是自然单元,其中许多区域至少由两个不同的生物组成部分组成。