Zhang Guang-Tan, Zhang Xue-Dong
Department of General Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Am Surg. 2013 Apr;79(4):407-13.
To evaluate the feasibility and safety of hand-assisted laparoscopic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer, we compared the operative outcomes between two methods for dissection of lymph nodes along the distal splenic artery (No. 11d) and at the splenic hilum (No. 10). Sixty-four patients with proximal or total gastric cancer operated on in our department from October 2009 to February 2012 were divided into two groups: the extracorporeal method group (EMG) and the intracorporeal method group (IMG). Operative time, estimated blood loss, number of lymph node retrieval, times of analgesic injection, time to the first flatus, and postoperative hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Estimated blood loss, times of analgesic injection, time to the first flatus, and postoperative hospital stay were equivalent between the two groups. The operative time was significantly shorter in the IMG than the EMG. There were no significant differences in tumor size, retrieved lymph nodes, American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control staging, or resection margins between the two groups. Hand-assisted laparoscopic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy is technically feasible and safe and allows for adequate lymphadenectomy.
为评估手辅助腹腔镜保留脾脏全胃切除术治疗胃癌的可行性及安全性,我们比较了两种清扫脾动脉远端(第11d组)及脾门(第10组)淋巴结方法的手术效果。2009年10月至2012年2月在我科接受手术的64例近端或全胃癌患者被分为两组:体外法组(EMG)和体内法组(IMG)。比较两组的手术时间、估计失血量、淋巴结清扫数目、镇痛剂注射次数、首次排气时间及术后住院时间。两组的估计失血量、镇痛剂注射次数、首次排气时间及术后住院时间相当。IMG组的手术时间显著短于EMG组。两组在肿瘤大小、清扫淋巴结数目、美国癌症联合委员会/国际癌症控制联盟分期或切缘方面无显著差异。手辅助腹腔镜保留脾脏全胃切除术在技术上可行且安全,可进行充分的淋巴结清扫。