Engineering Design Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.
BMC Med. 2013 Apr 10;11:103. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-103.
Current policies encourage healthcare institutions to acquire clinical information systems (CIS) so that captured data can be used for secondary purposes, including clinical process improvement. Such policies do not account for the extra work required to repurpose data for uses other than direct clinical care, making their implementation problematic. This paper aims to analyze the strategies employed by clinical units to use data effectively for both direct clinical care and clinical process improvement.
Ethnographic methods were employed. A total of 54 contextual interviews with health professionals spanning various disciplines and 18 hours of observation were carried out in 5 intensive care units in England using an advanced CIS. Case studies of how the extra work was achieved in each unit were derived from the data and then compared.
We found that extra work is required to repurpose CIS data for clinical process improvement. Health professionals must enter data not required for clinical care and manipulation of this data into a machine-readable form is often necessary. Ambiguity over who should be responsible for this extra work hindered CIS data usage for clinical process improvement. We describe 11 strategies employed by units to accommodate this extra work, distributing it across roles. Seven of these motivated data entry by health professionals and four addressed the machine readability of data. Many of the strategies relied heavily on the skill and leadership of local clinical customizers.
To realize the expected clinical process improvements by the use of CIS data, clinical leaders and policy makers need to recognize and support the redistribution of the extra work that is involved in data repurposing. Adequate time, funding, and appropriate motivation are needed to enable units to acquire and deliver the necessary skills in CIS customization.
当前的政策鼓励医疗机构获取临床信息系统(CIS),以便将捕获的数据用于次要目的,包括临床流程改进。这些政策没有考虑到重新调整数据用途所需的额外工作,这使得它们的实施变得复杂。本文旨在分析临床单位为直接临床护理和临床流程改进有效使用数据所采用的策略。
采用民族志方法。在英格兰的 5 个重症监护病房中,使用先进的 CIS 进行了共计 54 次与跨学科的卫生专业人员的背景访谈和 18 小时的观察。从数据中得出了每个单位如何完成额外工作的案例研究,并进行了比较。
我们发现,为了进行临床流程改进而重新调整 CIS 数据需要额外的工作。卫生专业人员必须输入临床护理不需要的数据,并且通常需要将这些数据转换为机器可读的形式。关于应由谁负责这项额外工作的模糊性阻碍了 CIS 数据在临床流程改进中的使用。我们描述了单位采用的 11 种策略来适应这项额外工作,将其分配到各个角色中。其中 7 种策略激励了卫生专业人员的数据录入,4 种策略解决了数据的机器可读性问题。许多策略严重依赖于当地临床定制者的技能和领导力。
为了通过使用 CIS 数据实现预期的临床流程改进,临床领导者和政策制定者需要认识到并支持重新分配数据重新调整所需的额外工作。需要有足够的时间、资金和适当的激励措施,使单位能够获得并提供 CIS 定制所需的必要技能。