Vermeulen Niki, Parker John N, Penders Bart
University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Endeavour. 2013 Sep;37(3):162-71. doi: 10.1016/j.endeavour.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
The history of science shows a shift from single-investigator 'little science' to increasingly large, expensive, multinational, interdisciplinary and interdependent 'big science'. In physics and allied fields this shift has been well documented, but the rise of collaboration in the life sciences and its effect on scientific work and knowledge has received little attention. Research in biology exhibits different historical trajectories and organisation of collaboration in field and laboratory - differences still visible in contemporary collaborations such as the Census of Marine Life and the Human Genome Project. We employ these case studies as strategic exemplars, supplemented with existing research on collaboration in biology, to expose the different motives, organisational forms and social dynamics underpinning contemporary large-scale collaborations in biology and their relations to historical patterns of collaboration in the life sciences. We find the interaction between research subject, research approach as well as research organisation influencing collaboration patterns and the work of scientists.
科学史显示出一种从单研究者的“小科学”向规模越来越大、成本越来越高、跨国、跨学科且相互依存的“大科学”的转变。在物理学及相关领域,这种转变已有详尽记录,但生命科学领域合作的兴起及其对科研工作和知识的影响却很少受到关注。生物学研究呈现出不同的历史轨迹以及野外和实验室合作的组织形式——这些差异在诸如海洋生物普查和人类基因组计划等当代合作中仍然可见。我们将这些案例研究用作策略典范,并辅以现有的生物学合作研究,以揭示支撑当代生物学大规模合作的不同动机、组织形式和社会动态,以及它们与生命科学合作历史模式的关系。我们发现研究主题、研究方法以及研究组织之间的相互作用影响着合作模式和科学家的工作。