Suppr超能文献

从混沌到希望:疗愈的叙事。

Chaos to hope: a narrative of healing.

机构信息

Traditional and Complementary Medicine Research Program, Health Innovations Research Institute, School of Health Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria, the United Kingdom.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2013 Dec;14(12):1826-38. doi: 10.1111/pme.12108. Epub 2013 Apr 12.

Abstract

AIMS

To investigate the progression of the illness and opioid journeys of people who are taking opioids for chronic non-cancer pain.

METHODS

In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 people who were taking opioids for non-cancer pain. A purposive sample was drawn from patients attending two pain clinics in Melbourne, Australia. Transcripts were analyzed within case, as individual narratives, and across case, as a thematic analysis. Conceptual explanatory variables were developed.

RESULTS

The experience of taking opioids for chronic non-cancer pain varies greatly between individuals and these diverse narratives-chaos, restitution, and quest narratives-raise questions about why and how some individuals find a way forward, while others remain in situations of chaotic and worsening ill health. We offer an explanation for this variability in terms of four key influences: support from individual health professionals and the health system; medical explanation or solutions; social support and social responsibilities; and the use of non-pharmaceutical interventions and self-help strategies. A unifying theme was the importance of maintaining hope.

CONCLUSION

The four key factors influencing the progress of people taking opioids for chronic non-cancer pain are rooted in the provisions made by society for caring for this patient group and involve relationships between patient and provider, between patients and their social world, and between different providers and their professional knowledge. In our patient sample, effective support involved the provision and maintenance of hope, and professionals who are knowledgeable about opioids and chronic pain, good communicators, and cognizant with their patients' social support and responsibilities.

摘要

目的

调查慢性非癌性疼痛患者使用阿片类药物的疾病进展和阿片类药物使用历程。

方法

对 20 名正在使用阿片类药物治疗非癌性疼痛的患者进行了深入的定性访谈。从澳大利亚墨尔本的两家疼痛诊所招募了有目的的样本。对每个案例的转录本进行了分析,作为个体叙述,并对整个案例进行了分析,作为主题分析。提出了概念性解释变量。

结果

服用阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌性疼痛的个体之间的体验差异很大,这些不同的叙述——混乱、恢复和探索叙述——提出了一些问题,即为什么有些个体找到了前进的道路,而有些个体则仍然处于混乱和健康状况恶化的状态。我们根据四个关键影响因素来解释这种可变性:个体卫生专业人员和卫生系统的支持;医学解释或解决方案;社会支持和社会责任;以及非药物干预和自我帮助策略的使用。一个统一的主题是保持希望的重要性。

结论

影响慢性非癌性疼痛患者使用阿片类药物进展的四个关键因素源于社会为照顾这一患者群体所做的规定,涉及患者与提供者之间、患者与其社会世界之间以及不同提供者与其专业知识之间的关系。在我们的患者样本中,有效的支持涉及提供和维持希望,以及那些对阿片类药物和慢性疼痛有深入了解、善于沟通并了解患者的社会支持和责任的专业人员。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验