• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质子泵抑制剂在 22 家美国中西部熟练护理设施中缺乏诊断指征的使用情况。

Use of proton pump inhibitors with lack of diagnostic indications in 22 Midwestern US skilled nursing facilities.

机构信息

Lutheran Home/Lutheran Life Communities, Arlington Heights, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jun;14(6):429-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.01.021. Epub 2013 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.01.021
PMID:23583000
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to identify proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescribing patterns in a population of older adults admitted to 22 Midwestern skilled long term care facilities (LTCF) with medical coverage provided by the US Medicare Part A program. The relationship between PPI prescribing patterns and specific ICD-9 diagnostic codes and symptoms management was examined. The long-term objective is appropriate PPI prescription guidance through the development of evidence- and regulation-based pharmacy formulary and policy practices, as well as practical prescribing guidance for practitioners who are supported by this pharmacy.

DESIGN

An observational cohort study was conducted, using prospectively collected and de-identified prescribing and diagnostic data from a convenience sample of all Medicare A skilled nursing patients admitted between January 1, 2010, and May 31, 2011, to 22 urban, suburban, and rural Midwestern US LTCFs.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A common pharmacy service de-identified and aggregated PPI prescribing data and patient diagnostic information. These secondary data were analyzed for trends and patterns related to PPI use for all Medicare A patients admitted to these 22 facilities during a 17-month period in 2010 and 2011.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

Rates of PPI use were determined and were compared with diagnostic codes. Of 1381 total admissions, 1100 patients (79.7%) were prescribed PPI. There was no appropriate diagnosis for PPI use in 718 patients (65.3%). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) tended to be the blanket diagnosis that was used most frequently for PPIs, but there was usually no follow-up or symptomatic evidence documented of active GERD. When long-term (current) use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (including aspirin) and/or anticoagulant therapy (warfarin) was considered as appropriate indications for 382 patients, 336 (24%) of all Medicare patients were still receiving PPIs with no relevant gastrointestinal ICD-9 diagnostic code. Total cost of PPIs prescribed from January 2010 to June 2011 was $348,414.

CONCLUSIONS

The examined PPI prescribing patterns show discordance between ICD-9 diagnostic code and prescribed use of PPIs in the study population. More than half (52%) of the total number of Medicare A patients were taking the medication without an indicated diagnosis. Even when NSAIDs and anticoagulant therapy were taken into consideration as valid reasons for PPI use, 24% of all patients admitted were still prescribed PPIs without a diagnosis that indicated the need for a PPI. Considering the economic cost, potential side effects, and CMS F329 regulations, which require that an LTCF resident's drug regimen be free from unnecessary medication, it is important that prescribers in LTCFs carefully consider use of PPIs in older adults in LTCFs and monitor the continued use of PPIs to prevent both the personal cost of physical side effects and drug-drug interactions, as well as the economic cost of unnecessary medication use.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是确定在 22 家中西部熟练护理长期护理机构(LTCF)中接受美国医疗保险 A 部分计划医疗覆盖的老年人群中质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的处方模式。研究考察了 PPI 处方模式与特定 ICD-9 诊断代码和症状管理之间的关系。长期目标是通过制定基于证据和法规的药房处方集和政策实践,以及为支持该药房的从业者提供实用的处方指导,来实现 PPI 的合理处方。

设计

对 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 5 月 31 日期间,22 家城市、郊区和农村中西部美国 LTCF 中所有 Medicare A 熟练护理患者入院的前瞻性收集和去识别处方和诊断数据进行了观察性队列研究。

地点和参与者

一个共同的药房服务去识别和汇总了 PPI 处方数据和患者诊断信息。对 2010 年和 2011 年 17 个月期间这 22 家机构收治的所有 Medicare A 患者的 PPI 使用趋势和模式进行了分析。

测量和结果

确定了 PPI 的使用率,并与诊断代码进行了比较。在 1381 例总入院患者中,有 1100 例(79.7%)患者开具了 PPI。718 例患者(65.3%)没有适当的 PPI 使用诊断。胃食管反流病(GERD)往往是最常被用于开具 PPI 的通用诊断,但通常没有记录到 GERD 的后续或症状性证据。当考虑到长期(目前)使用非甾体抗炎药(包括阿司匹林)和/或抗凝剂治疗(华法林)是 382 例患者的适当指征时,所有 Medicare 患者中有 336 例(24%)仍在服用 PPI,而没有相关的胃肠道 ICD-9 诊断代码。2010 年 1 月至 2011 年 6 月期间开具的 PPI 总费用为 348414 美元。

结论

研究人群中 PPI 处方模式与 ICD-9 诊断代码之间存在不一致。超过一半(52%)的 Medicare A 患者在没有指示性诊断的情况下服用了这种药物。即使考虑到 NSAIDs 和抗凝剂治疗作为 PPI 使用的有效原因,所有入院患者中仍有 24%的患者在没有指示需要 PPI 的诊断的情况下仍被开具了 PPI。考虑到经济成本、潜在的副作用以及 CMS F329 法规(要求 LTCF 居民的药物治疗方案中不包括不必要的药物),LTCF 中的处方者仔细考虑在 LTCF 中的老年人群中使用 PPI,并监测 PPI 的持续使用,以防止身体副作用和药物相互作用的个人成本以及不必要药物使用的经济成本。

相似文献

1
Use of proton pump inhibitors with lack of diagnostic indications in 22 Midwestern US skilled nursing facilities.质子泵抑制剂在 22 家美国中西部熟练护理设施中缺乏诊断指征的使用情况。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jun;14(6):429-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.01.021. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
2
A practice-based approach for converting from proton pump inhibitors to less costly therapy.一种基于实践的从质子泵抑制剂转换为成本较低治疗方法的途径。
Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Nov-Dec;4(6):263-70.
3
Evaluation of use of proton pump inhibitors in Greece.希腊质子泵抑制剂使用情况评估。
Eur J Intern Med. 2009 Mar;20(2):171-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2007.10.020. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
4
Proton pump inhibitors prescribing following the introduction of generic drugs.质子泵抑制剂在仿制药上市后的处方情况。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2012 Oct;42(10):1068-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2012.02696.x. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
5
Proton pump inhibitor discontinuation in long-term care.质子泵抑制剂在长期护理中的停药。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Sep;59(9):1658-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03545.x. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
6
Results of an intervention in an academic Internal Medicine Clinic to continue, step-down, or discontinue proton pump inhibitor therapy related to a tennessee medicaid formulary change.田纳西医疗补助药品目录变更后,在一家学术性内科诊所进行的关于继续、逐步减少或停用质子泵抑制剂治疗的干预结果。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 May;15(4):344-50. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.4.344.
7
Reducing the cost of proton pump inhibitors by adopting best practice.通过采用最佳实践降低质子泵抑制剂的成本。
Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(1):15-21.
8
Treatment patterns and symptom control in patients with GERD: US community-based survey.胃食管反流病患者的治疗模式与症状控制:基于美国社区的调查
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Aug;25(8):1869-78. doi: 10.1185/03007990903035745.
9
Therapeutic intent of proton pump inhibitor prescription among elderly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug users.质子泵抑制剂处方在老年非甾体抗炎药使用者中的治疗意图。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Sep 15;30(6):652-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04085.x. Epub 2009 Jul 2.
10
Gastroprotective drugs in Australia: utilization patterns between 1997 and 2006 in relation to NSAID prescribing.澳大利亚的胃保护药物:1997年至2006年期间与非甾体抗炎药处方相关的使用模式
Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):849-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective prescription review system correlated with more rational PPI medication use, better clinical outcomes and reduced PPI costs: experience from a retrospective cohort study.前瞻性处方审核系统与更合理的 PPI 药物使用、更好的临床结局和降低 PPI 成本相关:来自回顾性队列研究的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 20;23(1):1014. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09931-5.
2
Drug-Related Problems and Polypharmacy in Nursing Home Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study.养老院居民的药物相关问题和多重用药:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 4;19(7):4313. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074313.
3
Current practice of stress ulcer prophylaxis in a surgical patient cohort in a German university hospital.
德国一所大学附属医院外科患者群体中应激性溃疡预防的现行实践。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Dec;406(8):2849-2859. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02325-3. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
4
Continuous improvement on the rationality of prophylactic injectable PPIs usage by a clinical pharmacist-led guidance team at a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital.中国一家三级教学医院的临床药师主导的指导团队对预防性注射用质子泵抑制剂使用合理性的持续改进。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Oct;48(10):300060520954729. doi: 10.1177/0300060520954729.
5
Increased Risk of COVID-19 Among Users of Proton Pump Inhibitors.质子泵抑制剂使用者患 COVID-19 的风险增加。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;115(10):1707-1715. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000798.
6
Patterns of High-Dose and Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor Use: A Cross-Sectional Study in Six South Australian Residential Aged Care Services.高剂量和长期使用质子泵抑制剂的模式:南澳大利亚六个老年护理机构的横断面研究。
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2019 Sep;6(3):105-113. doi: 10.1007/s40801-019-0157-1.
7
Proton pump inhibitor use increases hepatic encephalopathy risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.质子泵抑制剂的使用会增加肝性脑病的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jun 7;25(21):2675-2682. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i21.2675.
8
A cross-sectional study of national outpatient gastric acid suppressant prescribing in the United States between 2009 and 2015.2009 年至 2015 年美国全国门诊抑酸剂处方的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 30;13(11):e0208461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208461. eCollection 2018.
9
The use of proton pump inhibitors among older adults with intellectual disability: A cross sectional observational study.智障老年人中质子泵抑制剂的使用:一项横断面观察性研究。
Saudi Pharm J. 2018 Nov;26(7):1012-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 May 24.
10
Quantifying Candidacy for Deprescribing of Proton Pump Inhibitors among Long-Term Care Residents.量化长期护理居民中停用质子泵抑制剂的适宜性
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Sep-Oct;71(5):302-307. Epub 2018 Oct 31.